Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="newfie" data-source="post: 6088848" data-attributes="member: 58700">First off i take any security breaches seriously and there has to be accountability if procedures were not followed. with that said this is a political masterpiece for the dems. Kudo&#039;s to them if they didnt add that name to an existing list then they definitely know how to maximize the benifs. I&#039;ve always said the dems play the game much better than the repubs. Ive seen too many of these in the past where this turned into nothing burgers once the facts come out so I&#039;ll wait for it all to come out. in this case there clearly was a discussion of information on the chat that was not approved for release.&nbsp; text chat took place weeks ago and the info just came out yesterday. right before the hearing today. Brilliant. many of the questions in todays hearing cant be answered in an unclassified hearing which makes the repubs look evasive. brilliant move on the part of the dems.i understand the signal app deletes messages immediately or over time which would make answering todays questions even tougher if you dont have it to reference.&nbsp; Did the reporter confer with dems to plan this new release knowing that since it allows them to make accusations that cant be verified. Tulsi and radcliffe did a poor job answering the questions today and did not help their cause.&nbsp; It sounds like battle plans were discussed in general terms and they should have just fessed up if that is the case. My concern here is you have gabbard and hegspeath in roles they&#039;re really not suited for and their inexperience may have jeoperdized our security and put our troops at risk. Again I&#039;ll wait for it all to come out before i pass final judgement.congress should also pull in the reporter and ask him what steps he took once he had that information. who did he call did he confer with democrat leadership on the timing for releasing this story?&nbsp; if this information is or was classified then did he discuss it with anyone who did not have the security clearances or need to know.&nbsp; I understand he recieved it and was reading it while in a DC parking lot.&nbsp; pull his phone records and see who he called next.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="newfie, post: 6088848, member: 58700"] First off i take any security breaches seriously and there has to be accountability if procedures were not followed. with that said this is a political masterpiece for the dems. Kudo's to them if they didnt add that name to an existing list then they definitely know how to maximize the benifs. I've always said the dems play the game much better than the repubs. [B]Ive seen too many of these in the past where this turned into nothing burgers once the facts come out so I'll wait for it all to come out. [/B] in this case there clearly was a discussion of information on the chat that was not approved for release. text chat took place weeks ago and the info just came out yesterday. right before the hearing today. Brilliant. many of the questions in todays hearing cant be answered in an unclassified hearing which makes the repubs look evasive. brilliant move on the part of the dems. i understand the signal app deletes messages immediately or over time which would make answering todays questions even tougher if you dont have it to reference. Did the reporter confer with dems to plan this new release knowing that since it allows them to make accusations that cant be verified. Tulsi and radcliffe did a poor job answering the questions today and did not help their cause. It sounds like battle plans were discussed in general terms and they should have just fessed up if that is the case. My concern here is you have gabbard and hegspeath in roles they're really not suited for and their inexperience may have jeoperdized our security and put our troops at risk. Again I'll wait for it all to come out before i pass final judgement. congress should also pull in the reporter and ask him what steps he took once he had that information. who did he call did he confer with democrat leadership on the timing for releasing this story? if this information is or was classified then did he discuss it with anyone who did not have the security clearances or need to know. I understand he recieved it and was reading it while in a DC parking lot. pull his phone records and see who he called next. [/QUOTE]

Verification