Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 6090333" data-attributes="member: 24302">You&#039;re focused on what the text was.&nbsp; The national security issue is that someone without a security clearance was on a text circle where participants needed to have a top secret clearance to be on it.&nbsp; And there&#039;s something else beyond that even.&nbsp; A need to know.&nbsp; Someone can have a top secret clearance but not be privy to what is being discussed by certain officials on certain topics.&nbsp; AND FOR THE TRILLIONTH TIME, I didn&#039;t say someone did anything illegal.&nbsp; I said the matter should be investigated and IF, IF, IF someone did something illegal they should be held accountable.&nbsp; Either someone made a mistake, or blunder, and they need to make sure it doesn&#039;t happen again, or someone may have had a sinister motive for including that reporter.&nbsp; That&#039;s why you investigate, to ascertain the truth.&nbsp; Why is this difficult to understand?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 6090333, member: 24302"] You're focused on what the text was. The national security issue is that someone without a security clearance was on a text circle where participants needed to have a top secret clearance to be on it. And there's something else beyond that even. A need to know. Someone can have a top secret clearance but not be privy to what is being discussed by certain officials on certain topics. AND FOR THE TRILLIONTH TIME, I didn't say someone did anything illegal. I said the matter should be investigated and IF, IF, IF someone did something illegal they should be held accountable. Either someone made a mistake, or blunder, and they need to make sure it doesn't happen again, or someone may have had a sinister motive for including that reporter. That's why you investigate, to ascertain the truth. Why is this difficult to understand? [/QUOTE]

Verification