Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="newfie" data-source="post: 6101495" data-attributes="member: 58700"><p>whatever you want to hear is another chapter. I'm more fascinated by the legal aspects of this case.</p><p>The supreme court has no jurisdiction over El Salvador . Their instruction is that trump must facilitate .</p><p>Facilitate is vaugue wording that basically means they think trump should not have sent this guy out of country. </p><p>So I dont know what he iis going but he can basically say hey Bukele would your return this guy , Bekele can say heck no and that would be the end of the conversation. this order only requires Trump to make an attempt to get him back. </p><p>there is another legal expression that the supreme court should have considered that being possession is 9/10's of the law. </p><p></p><p>short answer supreme court does not seem to hold out much hope of the guy being returned but made some vague wording that all 9 could agree on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="newfie, post: 6101495, member: 58700"] whatever you want to hear is another chapter. I'm more fascinated by the legal aspects of this case. The supreme court has no jurisdiction over El Salvador . Their instruction is that trump must facilitate . Facilitate is vaugue wording that basically means they think trump should not have sent this guy out of country. So I dont know what he iis going but he can basically say hey Bukele would your return this guy , Bekele can say heck no and that would be the end of the conversation. this order only requires Trump to make an attempt to get him back. there is another legal expression that the supreme court should have considered that being possession is 9/10's of the law. short answer supreme court does not seem to hold out much hope of the guy being returned but made some vague wording that all 9 could agree on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD
Top
