Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Appvol" data-source="post: 6154692" data-attributes="member: 63641">It’s funny how you leave out details. If you got citizenship because of fraud or committed a crime after getting citizenship maybe it should be revoked. Probably a left leaning article but sounds like Obama did it[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.democracydocket.com/analysis/trump-citizenship-justice-department-denaturalization/[/URL]In keeping with Trump’s goal, the DOJ recently said it would begin aggressively stripping some Americans of their citizenship through a process called denaturalization. Permitted by federal law, the process allows the government to take away citizenship from a naturalized citizen under very specific situations, such as if the person’s citizenship was obtained illegally through fraud.While rare throughout much of U.S. history, denaturalization was frequently used in the early years of the Cold War before the Supreme Court heavily curtailed the tactic in <a href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/387/253/" target="_blank">1967</a>. It resurged in use during the Obama administration and further expanded during Trump’s first term</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Appvol, post: 6154692, member: 63641"] It’s funny how you leave out details. If you got citizenship because of fraud or committed a crime after getting citizenship maybe it should be revoked. Probably a left leaning article but sounds like Obama did it [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.democracydocket.com/analysis/trump-citizenship-justice-department-denaturalization/[/URL] In keeping with Trump’s goal, the DOJ recently said it would begin aggressively stripping some Americans of their citizenship through a process called denaturalization. Permitted by federal law, the process allows the government to take away citizenship from a naturalized citizen under very specific situations, such as if the person’s citizenship was obtained illegally through fraud. While rare throughout much of U.S. history, denaturalization was frequently used in the early years of the Cold War before the Supreme Court heavily curtailed the tactic in [URL='https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/387/253/']1967[/URL]. It resurged in use during the Obama administration and further expanded during Trump’s first term [/QUOTE]

Verification