Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Logic" data-source="post: 3597284" data-attributes="member: 73246">This post would be more comforting if contract violations went more in favor to us workers. But more often than not it goes to UPS or at best they get a slap on the wrist 3 months down the road.&nbsp; Also, all this language does is allows a driver to switch routes, which is not what we want to do. We want our routes protected from major changes.&nbsp; If they were to change all start times to noon(not saying that will happen, but let&#039;s just play it out to see) then the only option for a driver is to bump someone who has to start at noon anyway. Article 40 would be a nice protection from this if everyone agreed that &quot;hours of work&quot; meant our current start times, but all they have to say is that drivers are getting their 8, 9, 10, hours etc. as normal so normal hours of work. And with my local they will not fight something like that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Logic, post: 3597284, member: 73246"] This post would be more comforting if contract violations went more in favor to us workers. But more often than not it goes to UPS or at best they get a slap on the wrist 3 months down the road. Also, all this language does is allows a driver to switch routes, which is not what we want to do. We want our routes protected from major changes. If they were to change all start times to noon(not saying that will happen, but let's just play it out to see) then the only option for a driver is to bump someone who has to start at noon anyway. Article 40 would be a nice protection from this if everyone agreed that "hours of work" meant our current start times, but all they have to say is that drivers are getting their 8, 9, 10, hours etc. as normal so normal hours of work. And with my local they will not fight something like that. [/QUOTE]

Verification