Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
trump 2016
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 2502860" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>Hearing Trump say that burning a flag should cost a person their citizenship and a year in jail is nothing more than one jackass's reaction to another jackass's action. Why take either jackass serious as nothing more than over emotional, unthinking little 8itches?</p><p></p><p>On another note, that being the recent news about Trump talks with Carrier to keep jobs in the US, there should be true transparency to these talks and lets see what deals were really turned?</p><p></p><p>From <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/29/business/trump-to-announce-carrier-plant-will-keep-jobs-in-us.html?_r=0" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000"><strong>NYT's piece</strong></span></a>:</p><p></p><p><em>"While Carrier will forfeit some $65 million a year in savings the move was supposed to generate, that’s a small price to pay to avoid the public relations damage from moving the jobs as well as a possible threat to United Technologies’ far-larger military contracting business.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Roughly 10 percent of United Technologies’ $56 billion in revenue comes from the federal government; the Pentagon is its single largest customer. With $4 billion in profit last year, the company has the flexibility to find the savings elsewhere."</em></p><p></p><p>Also stated in the article and a valid point:</p><p></p><p><em>"And just as only a confirmed anti-Communist like Richard Nixon could go to China, so only a businessman like Mr. Trump could take on corporate America without being called a Bernie Sanders-style socialist. If Barack Obama had tried the same maneuver, he’d probably have drawn criticism for intervening in the free market."</em></p><p></p><p>Quick glance: <a href="http://www.utc.com/Who-We-Are/Pages/At-A-Glance.aspx" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000"><strong>Who is United Technologies?</strong></span></a></p><p></p><p>Seems to me a lot of room to slide in special favors and privilege as payment for making certain things look good. Our President's first lesson to us in the <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Trump-Art-Deal-Donald-J/dp/0399594493" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000"><strong>"Art of the Deal!"</strong></span></a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 2502860, member: 2189"] Hearing Trump say that burning a flag should cost a person their citizenship and a year in jail is nothing more than one jackass's reaction to another jackass's action. Why take either jackass serious as nothing more than over emotional, unthinking little 8itches? On another note, that being the recent news about Trump talks with Carrier to keep jobs in the US, there should be true transparency to these talks and lets see what deals were really turned? From [URL='http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/29/business/trump-to-announce-carrier-plant-will-keep-jobs-in-us.html?_r=0'][COLOR=#ff0000][B]NYT's piece[/B][/COLOR][/URL]: [I]"While Carrier will forfeit some $65 million a year in savings the move was supposed to generate, that’s a small price to pay to avoid the public relations damage from moving the jobs as well as a possible threat to United Technologies’ far-larger military contracting business. Roughly 10 percent of United Technologies’ $56 billion in revenue comes from the federal government; the Pentagon is its single largest customer. With $4 billion in profit last year, the company has the flexibility to find the savings elsewhere."[/I] Also stated in the article and a valid point: [I]"And just as only a confirmed anti-Communist like Richard Nixon could go to China, so only a businessman like Mr. Trump could take on corporate America without being called a Bernie Sanders-style socialist. If Barack Obama had tried the same maneuver, he’d probably have drawn criticism for intervening in the free market."[/I] Quick glance: [URL='http://www.utc.com/Who-We-Are/Pages/At-A-Glance.aspx'][COLOR=#ff0000][B]Who is United Technologies?[/B][/COLOR][/URL] Seems to me a lot of room to slide in special favors and privilege as payment for making certain things look good. Our President's first lesson to us in the [URL='https://www.amazon.com/Trump-Art-Deal-Donald-J/dp/0399594493'][COLOR=#ff0000][B]"Art of the Deal!"[/B][/COLOR][/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
trump 2016
Top