Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Trump Shot!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Babagounj" data-source="post: 5952146" data-attributes="member: 12952"><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/07/13/flashback-bennie-thompson-top-dem-pelosis-j6-committee-called-stripping-trumps-secret-service-protection/[/URL]</p><p>The Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable (<a href="https://democrats-homeland.house.gov/imo/media/doc/disgraced_former_protectees_act_text.pdf" target="_blank">DISGRACED</a>) Former Protectees Act says that protection will “terminate for any person upon sentencing following conviction for a Federal or State offense that is punishable for a term of imprisonment of at least one year.”</p><p></p><p>Thompson <a href="https://democrats-homeland.house.gov/imo/media/doc/disgraced_former_protectees_act_factsheet1.pdf" target="_blank">argues</a> in a fact sheet for the DISGRACED Former Protectees Act, that the bill “would remove the potential for conflicting lines of authority within prisons and allow judges to weigh the sentencing of individuals without having to factor in the logistical concerns of convicts with Secret Service protection.”</p><p></p><p>Although Trump’s name is not mentioned in the bill’s text, the fact sheet points out that “former President Donald J. Trump’s unprecedented 91 felony charges in Federal and State courts across the country have created a new exigency that Congress must address to ensure Secret Service protection does not interfere with the criminal judicial process and the administration of justice.”</p><p></p><p>The fact sheet also points out that the bill proposed by Thompson will “apply to former President Trump.”</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Babagounj, post: 5952146, member: 12952"] [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/07/13/flashback-bennie-thompson-top-dem-pelosis-j6-committee-called-stripping-trumps-secret-service-protection/[/URL] The Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable ([URL='https://democrats-homeland.house.gov/imo/media/doc/disgraced_former_protectees_act_text.pdf']DISGRACED[/URL]) Former Protectees Act says that protection will “terminate for any person upon sentencing following conviction for a Federal or State offense that is punishable for a term of imprisonment of at least one year.” Thompson [URL='https://democrats-homeland.house.gov/imo/media/doc/disgraced_former_protectees_act_factsheet1.pdf']argues[/URL] in a fact sheet for the DISGRACED Former Protectees Act, that the bill “would remove the potential for conflicting lines of authority within prisons and allow judges to weigh the sentencing of individuals without having to factor in the logistical concerns of convicts with Secret Service protection.” Although Trump’s name is not mentioned in the bill’s text, the fact sheet points out that “former President Donald J. Trump’s unprecedented 91 felony charges in Federal and State courts across the country have created a new exigency that Congress must address to ensure Secret Service protection does not interfere with the criminal judicial process and the administration of justice.” The fact sheet also points out that the bill proposed by Thompson will “apply to former President Trump.” [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Trump Shot!
Top