Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Trump Shot!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="newfie" data-source="post: 5956070" data-attributes="member: 58700"><p>this argument is getting overplayed and twisted driven by Jack Smiths overzealous prosecution of trump. </p><p>presidential immunity is not a catch all. </p><p></p><p>there is still a constitutional process for this type of action. its called impeachment . once successfully impeached and removed from office the president would be stripped of much of his protection and it would be easier to arrest and try him for his actions. At that point the courts would have to make a ruling as to whether it was an official act. which means the president better have a very strong argument as to why his ordered assassination was an official act. </p><p></p><p>the other thing those who engage in this hyperbole forget is that any number of military leaders in the entire chain of command could refuse to carry out this assassination if determining it was an unlawful order.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="newfie, post: 5956070, member: 58700"] this argument is getting overplayed and twisted driven by Jack Smiths overzealous prosecution of trump. presidential immunity is not a catch all. there is still a constitutional process for this type of action. its called impeachment . once successfully impeached and removed from office the president would be stripped of much of his protection and it would be easier to arrest and try him for his actions. At that point the courts would have to make a ruling as to whether it was an official act. which means the president better have a very strong argument as to why his ordered assassination was an official act. the other thing those who engage in this hyperbole forget is that any number of military leaders in the entire chain of command could refuse to carry out this assassination if determining it was an unlawful order. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Trump Shot!
Top