Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Tucson Shooting !
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 799202" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>My understanding is that the alleged shooter's behavior prior to the murders never crossed the legal threshold of being clinically diagnosed with a mental illness. He had not been civilly committed, he did not have a restraining order out against him, and he had never been convicted of any crime. </p><p> </p><p>Under Federal law, any person anywhere in the US who buys a gun from a licensed dealer (such as the Sportsmans Warehouse where the alleged shooter bought his Glock) is required to submit to a background check and be fingerprinted. Some states do not have the ability to do an "instant check" and require the purchaser to wait for up to 7 days before taking posession of the gun. Other states...such as mine (Oregon) or Arizona, are able to do the check instantly and if the purchaser does not show up in the database as having a criminal record, an active restraining order, or a verifiable history of medically diagnosed mental illness, they can take posession of the gun immediately.</p><p> </p><p>Its important to remember a few facts here. First of all, the alleged shooter bought the gun on November 30th, almost a month and a half prior to the murders. Second of all, the alleged shooter had no criminal record and had never been medically diagnosed with a mental defect or subjected to any sort of civil commitment that would show up on a background check. And thirdly, if the alleged shooter <em>had</em> been flagged and denied on his background check he could have simply gone to the online classified ads and purchased a gun from a private party. Remember that we are talking about a guy who allegedly <em>stalked</em> Rep Giffords for <em>years</em> and had <em>all the time in the world</em> to plan out his <em>premeditated</em> crime...so even if he <em>had</em> walked out of that Sportmans Warehouse empty-handed back on November 30th <strong>he still would have had over a month to obtain a gun by other means.</strong></p><p> </p><p>I dont necesarily object to the idea of background checks....I submitted to a very thorough one myself when I got my concealed handgun permit....but in a situation such as the tragedy that just occured it is not realistic to think that a background check would have affected the outcome at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 799202, member: 14668"] My understanding is that the alleged shooter's behavior prior to the murders never crossed the legal threshold of being clinically diagnosed with a mental illness. He had not been civilly committed, he did not have a restraining order out against him, and he had never been convicted of any crime. Under Federal law, any person anywhere in the US who buys a gun from a licensed dealer (such as the Sportsmans Warehouse where the alleged shooter bought his Glock) is required to submit to a background check and be fingerprinted. Some states do not have the ability to do an "instant check" and require the purchaser to wait for up to 7 days before taking posession of the gun. Other states...such as mine (Oregon) or Arizona, are able to do the check instantly and if the purchaser does not show up in the database as having a criminal record, an active restraining order, or a verifiable history of medically diagnosed mental illness, they can take posession of the gun immediately. Its important to remember a few facts here. First of all, the alleged shooter bought the gun on November 30th, almost a month and a half prior to the murders. Second of all, the alleged shooter had no criminal record and had never been medically diagnosed with a mental defect or subjected to any sort of civil commitment that would show up on a background check. And thirdly, if the alleged shooter [I]had[/I] been flagged and denied on his background check he could have simply gone to the online classified ads and purchased a gun from a private party. Remember that we are talking about a guy who allegedly [I]stalked[/I] Rep Giffords for [I]years[/I] and had [I]all the time in the world[/I] to plan out his [I]premeditated[/I] crime...so even if he [I]had[/I] walked out of that Sportmans Warehouse empty-handed back on November 30th [B]he still would have had over a month to obtain a gun by other means.[/B] I dont necesarily object to the idea of background checks....I submitted to a very thorough one myself when I got my concealed handgun permit....but in a situation such as the tragedy that just occured it is not realistic to think that a background check would have affected the outcome at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Tucson Shooting !
Top