Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Under No Circumstances Can 22.4 Be Allowed To Remain
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 3705162" data-attributes="member: 63706"><p>How many drivers actually bid a Tuesday to Saturday shift? How many drivers actually complained about working weekends? Of those, how many were m-friend drivers being laid off on Mondays and "forced" to work Saturday, and how many were drivers who actually bid t-s? You and the union keep insisting that drivers complaining about working weekends are a main reason for creating 22.4, but unless someone can answer those questions about who actually was complaining, I call BS on the entire premise. It's a red herring, and 22.4 is not even a good solution to this made up problem. </p><p></p><p>The only people who were unhappy about driving weekends were:</p><p>A: the ones who bid a m-friend shift, then had a bait n' switch with the last contract and were forced onto a t-s shift. </p><p>B: the drivers who were m-friend and never got moved to a t-s shift, but had to work Saturday because they were laid off on Monday. </p><p></p><p>I would have gladly bid a t-s shift if it meant I started driving even a year earlier than I did. If I were part time still, waiting to drive, I would rather bid a w-su shift as a full time package car driver than a 22.4. Some drivers in my center were hoping they would start Saturday operations so they could bid a t-s shift. </p><p></p><p>You can't just make up imaginary bull crap, and blame everyone you disagree with for not being able to make up their minds. Those of us on this forum who oppose 22.4 have never changed our position. 22.4 has been examined from every single angle imaginable, every excuse for creating it has been resoundingly and definitively refuted. No matter which way you look at it 22.4 is bad. If your area has bad language, or can't enforce the language properly, that needs to be addressed in your area, and we would all wholeheartedly support any such efforts any way we could.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 3705162, member: 63706"] How many drivers actually bid a Tuesday to Saturday shift? How many drivers actually complained about working weekends? Of those, how many were m-friend drivers being laid off on Mondays and "forced" to work Saturday, and how many were drivers who actually bid t-s? You and the union keep insisting that drivers complaining about working weekends are a main reason for creating 22.4, but unless someone can answer those questions about who actually was complaining, I call BS on the entire premise. It's a red herring, and 22.4 is not even a good solution to this made up problem. The only people who were unhappy about driving weekends were: A: the ones who bid a m-friend shift, then had a bait n' switch with the last contract and were forced onto a t-s shift. B: the drivers who were m-friend and never got moved to a t-s shift, but had to work Saturday because they were laid off on Monday. I would have gladly bid a t-s shift if it meant I started driving even a year earlier than I did. If I were part time still, waiting to drive, I would rather bid a w-su shift as a full time package car driver than a 22.4. Some drivers in my center were hoping they would start Saturday operations so they could bid a t-s shift. You can't just make up imaginary bull crap, and blame everyone you disagree with for not being able to make up their minds. Those of us on this forum who oppose 22.4 have never changed our position. 22.4 has been examined from every single angle imaginable, every excuse for creating it has been resoundingly and definitively refuted. No matter which way you look at it 22.4 is bad. If your area has bad language, or can't enforce the language properly, that needs to be addressed in your area, and we would all wholeheartedly support any such efforts any way we could. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Under No Circumstances Can 22.4 Be Allowed To Remain
Top