Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="reydluap" data-source="post: 78263" data-attributes="member: 1583">Ok folks.&nbsp; I&#039;ve been reading these post all along and do understand the tension that&#039;s being released.&nbsp; BUT, lashing out at tie is not going to help you out one damn bit. Stick with your point please. &nbsp;&nbsp; Now for my comment/question. I&#039;m being sincere in this comment and am not trying to be argumentative. I just truely don&#039;t know the answer.&nbsp; Does upper management think that since computers are getting newer and &quot;more reliable&quot; that it won&#039;t take as many technical people to keep them going? For example, 5 years or so ago, our DIADs would &quot;go down&quot; out on area every few weeks. Now I have only had one failure in years. I realize that we now have boo-koo more computers than we did even 5 years ago, but are they made better and need fewer people for maintenance? Don&#039;t bite my head off, I&#039;m just a delivery driver asking for your reply.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="reydluap, post: 78263, member: 1583"] Ok folks. I've been reading these post all along and do understand the tension that's being released. BUT, lashing out at tie is not going to help you out one damn bit. Stick with your point please. Now for my comment/question. I'm being sincere in this comment and am not trying to be argumentative. I just truely don't know the answer. Does upper management think that since computers are getting newer and "more reliable" that it won't take as many technical people to keep them going? For example, 5 years or so ago, our DIADs would "go down" out on area every few weeks. Now I have only had one failure in years. I realize that we now have boo-koo more computers than we did even 5 years ago, but are they made better and need fewer people for maintenance? Don't bite my head off, I'm just a delivery driver asking for your reply. [/QUOTE]

Verification