Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="catstalking" data-source="post: 5721816" data-attributes="member: 50268">stops =/= pieces not to mention an overall drop in volume doesn&#039;t mean each stop loses pieces, it can mean some stops just have 0this is piddlesome <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2&nbsp; &nbsp; :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" />, I have actual figures that I can look at going back over a decade, you have anecdotes and mass media news articlesbottom line: no matter how inefficient YOU think ORION has been, the results say otherwise which is why UPS didn&#039;t drop it like a hot rockUPS has ZERO QUALMS about nuking literally any project if it shows being unprofitable in the slightest, I&#039;ve seen it countless timesedit: like seriously if UPS had data that showed you delivering in flip flops would make them money, your ass would be in clogs by the end of the week</blockquote>

[QUOTE="catstalking, post: 5721816, member: 50268"] stops =/= pieces not to mention an overall drop in volume doesn't mean each stop loses pieces, it can mean some stops just have 0 this is piddlesome :censored:, I have actual figures that I can look at going back over a decade, you have anecdotes and mass media news articles bottom line: no matter how inefficient YOU think ORION has been, the results say otherwise which is why UPS didn't drop it like a hot rock UPS has ZERO QUALMS about nuking literally any project if it shows being unprofitable in the slightest, I've seen it countless times edit: like seriously if UPS had data that showed you delivering in flip flops would make them money, your ass would be in clogs by the end of the week [/QUOTE]

Verification