Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 4949162" data-attributes="member: 63706">They ignored or cancelled all the experts that were right about the best approach to &quot;control&quot; an uncontrollable force of nature. I wish I could say It&#039;s surprising that anyone still believes this absurd talking point.If you&#039;re afraid of other people&#039;s breath, stay home. Masks don&#039;t stop aerosolized droplets, they increase them. The ongoing mask studies are looking pretty bad. Masks mandate areas seem to have more transmission in low and moderate community transmission areas vs no mask mandate areas. The difference is even more obvious in areas of high community transmission rates. The mask myth is dead. But it was dead on arrival, you&#039;ve been strapping a corpse of an idea to your face.I&#039;m sorry that you don&#039;t see the problem with continuing to believe people who constantly lie to you. All the proof I need not to get the shot is that there is not enough long term safety or effectiveness data history. Nothing more needed. Let&#039;s talk again in 7 years.Ivermectin and HCQ? Yes, those have been around for a long time.That&#039;s all there is.It&#039;s is objectively evil to justify the release a bioweapon for corporate profit.It is crazy. Insane, really.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 4949162, member: 63706"] They ignored or cancelled all the experts that were right about the best approach to "control" an uncontrollable force of nature. I wish I could say It's surprising that anyone still believes this absurd talking point. If you're afraid of other people's breath, stay home. Masks don't stop aerosolized droplets, they increase them. The ongoing mask studies are looking pretty bad. Masks mandate areas seem to have more transmission in low and moderate community transmission areas vs no mask mandate areas. The difference is even more obvious in areas of high community transmission rates. The mask myth is dead. But it was dead on arrival, you've been strapping a corpse of an idea to your face. I'm sorry that you don't see the problem with continuing to believe people who constantly lie to you. All the proof I need not to get the shot is that there is not enough long term safety or effectiveness data history. Nothing more needed. Let's talk again in 7 years. Ivermectin and HCQ? Yes, those have been around for a long time. That's all there is. It's is objectively evil to justify the release a bioweapon for corporate profit. It is crazy. Insane, really. [/QUOTE]

Verification