Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="brownman2075" data-source="post: 4970877" data-attributes="member: 73641">World Population Review vs an state internal legal research document. The first sounds real trust worthy. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🙄" title="Face with rolling eyes&nbsp; &nbsp; :rolling_eyes:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" data-shortname=":rolling_eyes:" /> Hmmmmm…… Well why not share the actual link to further substantiate your claim or maybe perhaps your “resource” is misleading its audience? Here is your link.[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/castle-doctrine-states[/URL]Hmmmmm… Interesting. It actually only provided one source of information and it inaccurately did so while making up the rest to lead it’s audience to believe in the title that they don’t have widespread basic common law rights to Castle Doctrine. Here is the source your article uses.[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/resources/terminology/self-defense-terms/castle-doctrine/[/URL]This comes directly from the resource that your article gives. It speaks an entirely different picture doesn’t it? However it does coincide the internal legal state research document that I shared in that “46” states have Castle Doctrine. One has limited castle law. The other four have case law.[ATTACH=full]348932[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="brownman2075, post: 4970877, member: 73641"] World Population Review vs an state internal legal research document. The first sounds real trust worthy. 🙄 Hmmmmm…… Well why not share the actual link to further substantiate your claim or maybe perhaps your “resource” is misleading its audience? Here is your link. [URL unfurl="true"]https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/castle-doctrine-states[/URL] Hmmmmm… Interesting. It actually only provided one source of information and it inaccurately did so while making up the rest to lead it’s audience to believe in the title that they don’t have widespread basic common law rights to Castle Doctrine. Here is the source your article uses. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/resources/terminology/self-defense-terms/castle-doctrine/[/URL] This comes directly from the resource that your article gives. It speaks an entirely different picture doesn’t it? However it does coincide the internal legal state research document that I shared in that “46” states have Castle Doctrine. One has limited castle law. The other four have case law. [ATTACH type="full"]348932[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification