Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="freehoodies" data-source="post: 4983697" data-attributes="member: 80887">The liberal who completely missed the point talking down to someone while being wrong meme is still active I see. Ignoring facts doesn&#039;t make them disappear.Its HUNDREDS of articles, not one. Reading comprehension bud.There were 3 high profile studies that were retracted, The NEJM, The Lancet, and the VA study. The only one that shows how many studies cited the data in them, the NEJM one I linked to, shows over 400 citing articles. Those studies have been cited an untold amount of times, I don&#039;t have the time or patience to open each one and check. When I looked into it back when I was saving those snapshots, some of the studies citing it AFTER it was retracted were actually into how to spot fraudulent data and understood it was fraudulent, but most of them were &quot;meta&quot; studies that were laundering the fraudulent data.&nbsp; The MSM who ran with these studies the second it came out and used it to smear Trump and Americans shows coordination.Governors blocked pharmacists from dispensing HCQ under threat of losing their license, massive fines, and or arrest. HCQ is safe, effective, and cheap. Off label use of FDA approved drugs has never been blocked by a governor, ever. The only rationale that I have heard that makes sense is that Emergency Use Authorization for the clotshot requires there not be a safe, effective alternative available.This doesn&#039;t have to be some evil &quot;depopulation&quot; conspiracy. The much more likely scenario is that the vaccine manufacturers are protecting their profits. Pfizer/Johnsonx2/AstraZeneca etc are all HUGE donators to both political parties, Pfizer ranks #25 on opensecrets with over 10million in 2019 just on lobbying for example. Pfizer expects profits of over 15 Billion dollars in 2021 alone from their clotshot. If tobacco corporations, soda manufacturers, hell even volkswagen would lie about their products safety, have scientists obfuscate the truth by publishing fraudulent data, and pay off politicians, how naive do you have to be to NOT be skeptical?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="freehoodies, post: 4983697, member: 80887"] The liberal who completely missed the point talking down to someone while being wrong meme is still active I see. Ignoring facts doesn't make them disappear. Its HUNDREDS of articles, not one. Reading comprehension bud. There were 3 high profile studies that were retracted, The NEJM, The Lancet, and the VA study. The only one that shows how many studies cited the data in them, the NEJM one I linked to, shows over 400 citing articles. Those studies have been cited an untold amount of times, I don't have the time or patience to open each one and check. When I looked into it back when I was saving those snapshots, some of the studies citing it AFTER it was retracted were actually into how to spot fraudulent data and understood it was fraudulent, but most of them were "meta" studies that were laundering the fraudulent data. The MSM who ran with these studies the second it came out and used it to smear Trump and Americans shows coordination. Governors blocked pharmacists from dispensing HCQ under threat of losing their license, massive fines, and or arrest. HCQ is safe, effective, and cheap. Off label use of FDA approved drugs has never been blocked by a governor, ever. The only rationale that I have heard that makes sense is that Emergency Use Authorization for the clotshot requires there not be a safe, effective alternative available. This doesn't have to be some evil "depopulation" conspiracy. The much more likely scenario is that the vaccine manufacturers are protecting their profits. Pfizer/Johnsonx2/AstraZeneca etc are all HUGE donators to both political parties, Pfizer ranks #25 on opensecrets with over 10million in 2019 just on lobbying for example. Pfizer expects profits of over 15 Billion dollars in 2021 alone from their clotshot. If tobacco corporations, soda manufacturers, hell even volkswagen would lie about their products safety, have scientists obfuscate the truth by publishing fraudulent data, and pay off politicians, how naive do you have to be to NOT be skeptical? [/QUOTE]

Verification