Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dulce Bombón" data-source="post: 3732381" data-attributes="member: 73998">This afternoon most of Part-Timers received a called from George and Lindsay, referring to all this &quot;Great Benefits&quot; they are offering. If you heard the called, was the same crap, with&nbsp; selective calls from Teamsters Members.They talked about social media influencing into the Vote No Movement, and telling us to compare how &quot;great benefits&quot; this contract is compared to other competitive companies.Encouraging us to Vote, Vote and Vote. Indicating this is not a &quot;perfect contract&quot; for part-timers, drivers, etc... So, to my &quot;point of view&quot;, this is a redundant information because Negotiators may be scare of the Vote No Movement and may passed. They may be information for education purposes, but not for people with&nbsp; intellectual comprehension, like Teamster Members, that read the language of this contract. They only focus on the numbers ($$), that only benefits new hires, not the existent UPS employees. What do you think?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dulce Bombón, post: 3732381, member: 73998"] This afternoon most of Part-Timers received a called from George and Lindsay, referring to all this "Great Benefits" they are offering. If you heard the called, was the same crap, with selective calls from Teamsters Members. They talked about social media influencing into the Vote No Movement, and telling us to compare how "great benefits" this contract is compared to other competitive companies. Encouraging us to Vote, Vote and Vote. Indicating this is not a "perfect contract" for part-timers, drivers, etc... So, to my "point of view", this is a redundant information because Negotiators may be scare of the Vote No Movement and may passed. They may be information for education purposes, but not for people with intellectual comprehension, like Teamster Members, that read the language of this contract. They only focus on the numbers ($$), that only benefits new hires, not the existent UPS employees. [B]What do you think?[/B] [/QUOTE]

Verification