Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Undertow" data-source="post: 3734924" data-attributes="member: 4550">Correct and it appears from a review of the &quot;Vote Yes&quot; propaganda I&#039;ve received in the mail that the negotiating committee either forget or just didn&#039;t want to mention the included 22.4 provision among the highlights of what they are promoting as such great deal.&nbsp; It&#039;s as if they don&#039;t want to admit there&#039;s potential for the hybrid position to exist.That might help explain such a lengthy delay from the time the TA was first announced to us finally getting to vote on it.&nbsp; After a month or two of looking at the overwhelming negative reaction to the proposal, they cynically just try their best to shield it from view hoping to entice enough of the rank and file with &quot;Protects Benefits&quot; and &quot; Addresses Harassment&quot;.&nbsp; What a disgusting joke.&nbsp; The only &quot;Vote Yes&quot; I&#039;d give at the moment is for Zuckerman to take charge of the next round of negotiations.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Undertow, post: 3734924, member: 4550"] Correct and it appears from a review of the "Vote Yes" propaganda I've received in the mail that the negotiating committee either forget or just didn't want to mention the included 22.4 provision among the highlights of what they are promoting as such great deal. It's as if they don't want to admit there's potential for the hybrid position to exist. That might help explain such a lengthy delay from the time the TA was first announced to us finally getting to vote on it. After a month or two of looking at the overwhelming negative reaction to the proposal, they cynically just try their best to shield it from view hoping to entice enough of the rank and file with "Protects Benefits" and " Addresses Harassment". What a disgusting joke. The only "Vote Yes" I'd give at the moment is for Zuckerman to take charge of the next round of negotiations. [/QUOTE]

Verification