Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bubblehead" data-source="post: 3132848" data-attributes="member: 14176">I&#039;m really sick of hearing this mindset from Union employees, and I&#039;ll tell you why.Both the Company and Union agreed to the verbiage in the contract in regards to production.If there is a worker that is &quot;lazy or undependable&quot; as you put it, there is a procedure in place to remedy that situation, and yes the Union is duty bound to protect those accused.This is a service paid for by the membership when needed.In the end, if those accused workers are allowed to persist, I submit to you that it is the Company who is &quot;lazy and undependable&quot;, or derelict in their duties, not the Union.It&#039;s actually [USER=561]@Dragon[/USER] (who &quot;liked&quot; your post) and his team, who is dropping the ball.Please stop putting that crap sandwich squarely in the Union&#039;s lap when it belongs in large part to the Company.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bubblehead, post: 3132848, member: 14176"] I'm really sick of hearing this mindset from Union employees, and I'll tell you why. Both the Company and Union agreed to the verbiage in the contract in regards to production. If there is a worker that is "lazy or undependable" as you put it, there is a procedure in place to remedy that situation, and yes the Union is duty bound to protect those accused. This is a service paid for by the membership when needed. In the end, if those accused workers are allowed to persist, I submit to you that it is the Company who is "lazy and undependable", or derelict in their duties, not the Union. It's actually [USER=561]@Dragon[/USER] (who "liked" your post) and his team, who is dropping the ball. Please stop putting that crap sandwich squarely in the Union's lap when it belongs in large part to the Company. [/QUOTE]

Verification