Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="browned out" data-source="post: 4031705" data-attributes="member: 8105">Yep; but somehow; the info regarding where to find the IBT constitution&nbsp; (or even let members know it exists) was not listed anywhere in the scare tactic IBT (UPS MGMT) postcards.Why in darn tootin&#039; do you think we are the last ones standing in way of this seniority destroying, union busting &quot;deal&quot;?&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 93% approval for a strike is overwhelming.OK;&nbsp;&nbsp; I believe you have already posted that BRF would not have been caught if she was more careful with her emails (or something to that effect).&nbsp; No Member should ever answer the question from the Panel as to if they were &quot;properly&quot; represented by their local union; unless that person has all the info.&nbsp;&nbsp; If Rob A. had the info uncovered and on the court record evidence of BRF colluding with UPS Labor in an attempt to have him discharged;&nbsp; Rob A&#039;s answer would have been different.BEST ANSWER for that coverall question &#039;Were you properly represented by you local Union?)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; THE ANSWER should always be I do not know.&nbsp; &nbsp; Unless the discharged UPSer is an attorney.&nbsp;&nbsp; No Wow from me; You continue with the nonsense and rhetoric.&nbsp; Just as I expected.The Hoffa Slapdicks at the last convention shot down proposed IBT Constitutional Amendments including Preventing the General Executive Board from approving contracts that have been rejected by a majority of the voting members.&nbsp;&nbsp; The following link is from the dreaded TDU. <a href="https://www.teamstersunited.org/hoffa_blocks_positive_changes_to_our_ibt_constitution" target="_blank">Hoffa Blocks Positive Changes to Our IBT Constitution</a>&nbsp; &nbsp; Is it not forthright?&nbsp;&nbsp; I am not TDU or TU. Are they lying?&nbsp; &nbsp; Do you know for a fact that a proposed amendment to prevent the GEB from approving a contract that has been rejected by a majority of the VOTING members was not shot down by the Hoffaites at the convention?&nbsp;&nbsp; If TDU or TU is being dishonest;&nbsp; and the proposed amendments were not attempted;&nbsp; I will call them out and take them to task on it.&nbsp; Unlike, your BUG denial of BRF&#039;s absolute violation of the IBT constitution.&nbsp; &nbsp; You should be ashamed.
&nbsp; &nbsp; You epitomize what is wrong with the IBT.&nbsp;&nbsp; At least you accrued the years required for a pension and retired.&nbsp; Most of these other jokers Hoffa/Taylor/Hall loyalists will be voted out.&nbsp;&nbsp; Instead of losing 20%, 40% or more of their income (exactly what RPCD&#039;s could lose).&nbsp;&nbsp; These vermin will be voted out.&nbsp; They will lose 100% of their income.Red Vest, Red Vest....Slapdick</blockquote>

[QUOTE="browned out, post: 4031705, member: 8105"] Yep; but somehow; the info regarding where to find the IBT constitution (or even let members know it exists) was not listed anywhere in the scare tactic IBT (UPS MGMT) postcards. Why in darn tootin' do you think we are the last ones standing in way of this seniority destroying, union busting "deal"? 93% approval for a strike is overwhelming. OK; I believe you have already posted that BRF would not have been caught if she was more careful with her emails (or something to that effect). No Member should ever answer the question from the Panel as to if they were "properly" represented by their local union; unless that person has all the info. If Rob A. had the info uncovered and on the court record evidence of BRF colluding with UPS Labor in an attempt to have him discharged; Rob A's answer would have been different. BEST ANSWER for that coverall question 'Were you properly represented by you local Union?) THE ANSWER should always be I do not know. Unless the discharged UPSer is an attorney. No Wow from me; You continue with the nonsense and rhetoric. Just as I expected. [LEFT][SIZE=16px][FONT=Verdana][COLOR=rgb(30, 24, 18)]The Hoffa Slapdicks at the last convention shot down proposed IBT Constitutional Amendments including Preventing the General Executive Board from approving contracts that have been rejected by a majority of the voting members. The following link is from the dreaded TDU. [URL='https://www.teamstersunited.org/hoffa_blocks_positive_changes_to_our_ibt_constitution']Hoffa Blocks Positive Changes to Our IBT Constitution[/URL] Is it not forthright? I am not TDU or TU. Are they lying? Do you know for a fact that a proposed amendment to prevent the GEB from approving a contract that has been rejected by a majority of the VOTING members was not shot down by the Hoffaites at the convention? If TDU or TU is being dishonest; and the proposed amendments were not attempted; I will call them out and take them to task on it. Unlike, your BUG denial of BRF's absolute violation of the IBT constitution. You should be ashamed. [/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE][/LEFT] You epitomize what is wrong with the IBT. At least you accrued the years required for a pension and retired. Most of these other jokers Hoffa/Taylor/Hall loyalists will be voted out. Instead of losing 20%, 40% or more of their income (exactly what RPCD's could lose). These vermin will be voted out. They will lose 100% of their income. Red Vest, Red Vest....Slapdick [/QUOTE]

Verification