stevetheupsguy
sʇǝʌǝʇɥǝndsƃnʎ
Hey Diz, how about making some skins for the DIAD V?
DIAD V Revealed
- Thread starter upsyo
- Start date
tieguy
Banned
here comes diad VI
stevetheupsguy
sʇǝʌǝʇɥǝndsƃnʎ
That's just the "Swiss" version. I'm sure the American version will have aps, as well.
stevetheupsguy
sʇǝʌǝʇɥǝndsƃnʎ
Ha Ha Ha. That's gonna be one, heavy, DIAD.
Dizzee
ɹǝqɯǝɯ ɹoıuǝs
UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)
Well-Known Member
Tiny Panda
Well-Known Member
Hopefully someone will come up with a Diad App for the Iphone then we can get some practice
Not exactly where I was going....
stevetheupsguy
sʇǝʌǝʇɥǝndsƃnʎ
Awesome skins Diz. Maybe we can convince the powers that be to desogn us some. I'll take the Florida and the Dalmation. I'd also carry the Swiss Army one. Let's see if you can come up with one for Klein.
Big Babooba
Well-Known Member
Out here, our mechanics belong to the International Association of Machinists. We have a gentleman's agreement - Machinists don't deliver packages and Teamsters don't fix trucks.
DiadDude
Well-Known Member
Have you previously used a DIAD with chicklet buttons?
Just Lurking
Well-Known Member
DiadDude,
How feasible would it be add the the ability to flag packages that you scan not in your EDD.
For example, your pre-loader cross loads a RDR stop between their two cars. When you scan the mis-loaded package it would flag "This package not in your EDD. Continue Y/N?" I know that you are to read every label but I see this no different than scanning a wrong address for "Address does not match. Continue Y/N?" prompt.
Am I kinda making my self clear?
How feasible would it be add the the ability to flag packages that you scan not in your EDD.
For example, your pre-loader cross loads a RDR stop between their two cars. When you scan the mis-loaded package it would flag "This package not in your EDD. Continue Y/N?" I know that you are to read every label but I see this no different than scanning a wrong address for "Address does not match. Continue Y/N?" prompt.
Am I kinda making my self clear?
UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)
Well-Known Member
Yes but your request would be redundant. Both statements basically say the same thing, that the address on the pkg you are scanning does not match the address of the active stop.
Just Lurking
Well-Known Member
Upstate
if you scan package from another loop (mis-laod) it just adds it to the active stop. EDD only keeps track of packages that are contained in your DIAD.
Try scanning a package from your truck and then scan a package from any other truck in the AM. It will just added to your stop.
So its not redundant.
if you scan package from another loop (mis-laod) it just adds it to the active stop. EDD only keeps track of packages that are contained in your DIAD.
Try scanning a package from your truck and then scan a package from any other truck in the AM. It will just added to your stop.
So its not redundant.
Similar threads
