Just A UPS Guy
Bully.
Your supplement supersedes the NMA regarding this issue.
2018 YES vote : Why does the IBT BACK THIS ?
- Thread starter rpoz11
- Start date
Your supplement supersedes the NMA regarding this issue.
BigBrown87
If it’s brown, it’s going down
Thanks for the info, will have to wait and see if the typo in the NM is ever addressed. I did ask my BA and he gave me no real answer other then trust me you will get your 40, not good enough in my book.
Just A UPS Guy
Bully.
It really changes nothing, I think it prob juat has to do with that section all being new language. It can't cut anyone's guaranteed hours, if they have the guarantee.
And unless the NMA explicitly addresses the issue, the supplements supersede the NMA. You also benefit from the better of either language.
542thruNthru
Well-Known Member
So with the new master language it doesn't have to be only the top 90%.
It will be anyone working a M-friend schedule. Bottom 10% or not.
Article 2 Section 2 let's you use which ever language is superior.
LagunaBrown
Well-Known Member
You are an amateur telling people lies. Article 2. Sec 2 NMA proves SWPR language is legit and guarantees us a 5 consecutive 8 hour days. Read the damn contract! You guys don’t know
and act like you are the cats meow.
LagunaBrown
Well-Known Member
Thx I didn’t notice you already adressed the guaranteed workweek. Appreciate it.
LagunaBrown
Well-Known Member
Basically it means if you didn’t have a guarantee then you still don’t and if you did then you keep it. It’s all depends on your supplements and riders.
LagunaBrown
Well-Known Member
We don’t want cover drivers totally eliminated. Most will go into 22.4 but a small amount will cover Monday’s and vacations. There is good ratio language that was won in a grievance that allows us to get drivers hired and it benefits us to keep them in play. Plus that’s how we jump starting RPCD progression pay from $18 to $27.
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
This I have a problem with. What if part timers don't want to work weekends AND be paid less to work those premium days?
If 22.4 passes it's the only gateway to becoming a full time driver then.
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
The problem I have is the IBT is happy to play whatever sides against each other they have to get a yes vote.
Why are you guys worried about 22.4? You won't have Saturday delivery for years so you won't have them.
Us: we don't agree with them period doesn't matter that we won't have them. We are standing up for our union brothers and sisters.
Union: but why? You won't have them.
Why are you guys worried about 22.4? You won't have Saturday delivery for years so you won't have them.
Us: we don't agree with them period doesn't matter that we won't have them. We are standing up for our union brothers and sisters.
Union: but why? You won't have them.
Unless. Someone retires. They still have to keep the same amount of regular package car driver jobs.
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
Yeah they have to keep 22.3 jobs too...
Looks like to need to buy some more package cars and putsome more routes in
silenze
Lunch is the best part of the day
We already have Saturday delivery by rpcd.
Those jobs are not protected. There will be a 4 - 5 year gap before enough drivers retire for anyone to have a chance to fill a top rate job.
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
And if another recession hits in the timeframe maybe 10 years.
Same here.
LagunaBrown
Well-Known Member
Not in our area. A part timer can wait till the RPCD spot opens and use his seniority over a 22.4
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
Where is that language because ft seniority has always trumped PT seniority.
542thruNthru
Well-Known Member
Actually I've posted it a few times and he is correct. In our supplement PT and 22.4 will go off of company seniority.
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
But that's wording added to the supplement only?
