What in your opinion is bad about it?
---the " when work is available" wording is a terrible precursor to the companys' upcoming true intentions.
( and don't retort with supplement blather; this should never have been thought of to be in the master in the first place )
--- No 9.5 protection for 22.4s
---1.5hour possible gap between hub and driving work for 22.4s
--- No 70 hour amendment after Hoffa was supposedly so upset over last peaks' imposing of said rule.
--- No clear wording of how much 22.4 can actually drive compared to how much inside work they will do.
( see, if UPS was honorable , teamsters may not have as much problem with a 22.4 getting paid less than an RPCD seeing as they would be getting paid less on road but being paid way more than usual while working inside )
...But of course with UPS' history of disregarding the written word in a contract coupled with no actual wording at all concerning inside to outside work for 22.4s' , we are probably correct to assume they will just drive the crap out of these guys till they drop.
I have more but you still have never answered why you think this contract is good. ( 14,800,000,000 does not count )
because the next contract will be even bigger than that with this little thing called inflation. So I'm not impressed that the total contract is worth more than the last and so on and so on. It should be that way in a perpetually inflationary world we live in.