Wally
BrownCafe Innovator & King of Puns
Nice. I don't know why she hates rich folk? Being rich is nice.It's a double unit set-up , each one goes for around $12K.
Nice. I don't know why she hates rich folk? Being rich is nice.It's a double unit set-up , each one goes for around $12K.
Yikes. Let's hope it's not this Kung-flu.Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg hospitalized with infection, court announces
And when they get through they hear the arguments too.She should be safe from the tRump flu, they are heading arguments by phone!
How old is she now!85 Year Old Justice Ginsburg Falls!
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg hospitalized with infection, court announces
How old is she now!
Future Covid death(You really need to learn how to post links.)
87. She is in the hospital for a gallstone that caused an infection.
She probably would have retired if Hillary got elected. If Trump is re-elected she will probably try to hang on in hopes of a Democrat in '24. They desperately don't want a 6-3 conservative court.If you have DECIDED to keep working at 87 years old, you have proven you can't make good DECISIONS. (Like a Supreme Court Justice would want to do...)
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg waited 4 months to say her cancer had returned
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is perhaps the most forthcoming member of the Supreme Court when it comes to telling the public about her many health issueswww.boston.com
A precedence was set 4 yrs ago. No replacement on election year. Would be interesting to see everyone's integrity when they flip flop again.Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg waited 4 months to say her cancer had returned
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is perhaps the most forthcoming member of the Supreme Court when it comes to telling the public about her many health issueswww.boston.com
Joni Ernst already explained how it’s different. The difference is this time there’s Republicans in both the White House and Senate so they will fill a vacancy. That’s it, she didn’t even pretend to have shame.A precedence was set 4 yrs ago. No replacement on election year. Would be interesting to see everyone's integrity when they flip flop again.
Wasn't really a precedent set then. That's been the custom for a very long time. As much as I want that extra conservative on the court I want them to stick to the tradition. Otherwise we'll have more liberal insanity. Even if Trump wins I pity the judge nominated for the open seat in the next term. Most likely a woman, and the libs will have pics of her pulling wings off of flies as a little girl and holding guns to the heads of men she raped in college. Christine Blasey Ford will come forth to tell about the time the judge as a young woman refused to have sex with a black woman(Racist! Homophobe!). She was there, saw the whole thing!A precedence was set 4 yrs ago. No replacement on election year. Would be interesting to see everyone's integrity when they flip flop again.
They have not been 'conservative' ... they have been Constitutionalist.The left would absolutely lose their minds if...........nvm, they dont have minds to lose.
Theyre gonna start throwing poop like wild monkeys when Trump replaces her with another staunch conservative.
I like the judges. Trump did a good job with that. Some of the best judges we’ve ever had on the court.They have not been 'conservative' ... they have been Constitutionalist.
They believe in Congress passing laws, not the SCOTUS making laws up.
There are still liberal and conservative wings of the court though with many votes coming down to each wing on opposite sides. They can't both be right in their interpretation of the Constitution. One might argue that Roberts is a strict constitutionalist because he often sides with the liberal wing. Might call him a traitor too, depending on your viewpoint!They have not been 'conservative' ... they have been Constitutionalist.
They believe in Congress passing laws, not the SCOTUS making laws up.
I see Roberts as a Constitutionalist, albeit not strict, that sides with Individual Freedom of USA citizens.There are still liberal and conservative wings of the court though with many votes coming down to each wing on opposite sides. They can't both be right in their interpretation of the Constitution. One might argue that Roberts is a strict constitutionalist because he often sides with the liberal wing. Might call him a traitor too, depending on your viewpoint!
That's why I put integrity into it.Joni Ernst already explained how it’s different. The difference is this time there’s Republicans in both the White House and Senate so they will fill a vacancy. That’s it, she didn’t even pretend to have shame.