9.5 Arbitration decision - Or - Why clear contract language is important

[IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U]

I believe you missed my point. Grievances aren't always "to get monetary compensation". And he probably would if he's half the legend that he pretends to be. But I highly doubt it.

Yes I agree it's a warning letter to management

 

[What'dyabringmetoday???]

Yes I agree it's a warning letter to management

Most of these "warnings" have "no merit" here. Oh well.

 

[Rack em]

Most of these "warnings" have "no merit" here. Oh well.

Sounds like you need new union representation that understands what merit is.

 

[What'dyabringmetoday???]

Sounds like you need new union representation that understands what merit is.

Yes. The entire union needs to be changed out. Scumbags.

 

[Maplewood]

I may have missed it but I believe the understand was about the first week. The driver was only violated once in the 5 months he was on 9.5 and it was towards the end of the 5 months if I remember correctly.
View attachment 264242



They attempted to change the wording but the company would not budge.
View attachment 264243

I don't know the actual source of this information. Someone said TDU sent it out. I don't have anything really against TDU but they do like to stir the pot. So I'll take this letter with a grain of salt.

I want to know why this case was even allowed to make it this far. Why go to arbitration with such a weak case and risk this kind of judgment.

T.oo
D.umb to
U.nderstand

 

[542thruNthru]

T.oo
D.umb
T.o
U.nderstand

Is that supposed to spell TDU?