Really? It seems you just made her point with this video... I don't know why you had to drop so low and basically make a bullying video.
A former IBT employee who never worked a day in her life as a Teamster in a Teamster craft and makes over $100k/year did a hit job on a rank and file package car driver for advocating against the contract.. and you're upset someone responded to that?
Funny you say that. I saw her walking in to my building this morning, standing with all of the local 174. So I would assume she is a Teamster..
She's a dues paying Teamster for the purposes of eligibility to run for union office but has never worked as a rank and file member. I put her in the same classification as Todd T and Christie B.
She was hired by IBT directly out of college and then began working for L174.
TINO = Teamster In Name OnlyFunny you say that. I saw her walking in to my building this morning, standing with all of the local 174. So I would assume she is a Teamster..
Because people are wretched human beings.Really? It seems you just made her point with this video... I don't know why you had to drop so low and basically make a bullying video.
Because we don't want college educated people in the Teamsters.She's a dues paying Teamster for the purposes of eligibility to run for union office but has never worked as a rank and file member. I put her in the same classification as Todd T and Christie B.
She was hired by IBT directly out of college and then began working for L174.
Because people are wretched human beings.
Because we don't want college educated people in the Teamsters.
That's cute that you're trying to paint me as anti-education. I got my degree while working PT at UPS.
There's nothing wrong with having a college degree and IBT (and even some locals) has a need for certain specialists (finance, legal, etc.) that may not have rank and file experience. However, we don't need "college professionals" with zero experience working as rank and file members in positions of leadership or doing social media hit jobs on rank and file members.
Yeah, discussing her breasts was something that needed to be addressed in that video. sureIf you put yourself out there like that attacking a rank and file member, you deserve to be ridiculed in turn.
If she wanted to simply present her argument as to why she thinks this is a good TA, I'd disagree and that would be the end of it.
Instead, she mentioned Tyler over 25 times by name, misrepresented what he said, attacked all Teamsters for being "weak", and waived the specter of a possible strike to try and scare people into a "yes" vote. She's in the same vein as Denis T, who spends his conference calls (on our dime, no less) attacking members and trying to scare us into voting for a substandard TA.
Yeah, discussing her breasts was something that needed to be addressed in that video. sure
I would have preferred one as the lead negotiator for this contract!!!Because we don't want college educated people in the Teamsters.
Not much to talk about....Yeah, discussing her breasts was something that needed to be addressed in that video. sure
I did not feel she attacked him in the video I was looking for facts to compareIf you put yourself out there like that attacking a rank and file member, you deserve to be ridiculed in turn.
If she wanted to simply present her argument as to why she thinks this is a good TA, I'd disagree and that would be the end of it.
Instead, she mentioned Tyler over 25 times by name, misrepresented what he said, attacked all Teamsters for being "weak", and waived the specter of a possible strike to try and scare people into a "yes" vote. She's in the same vein as Denis T, who spends his conference calls (on our dime, no less) attacking members and trying to scare us into voting for a substandard TA.
Video was a waste of time bring the facts because the no vote does have some points I agree withNot much to talk about....