dvalleyjim
Well-Known Member
Get the routes for free, build them up and sell them. Never buy into this.
From everything I have seen majority of franchise owners on a McDonalds generates 100,000-150,000 a year not millions. The payouts are fairly similar with a lot of the same problems and pressures as X but much larger workforce (slightly less skills too, hard to imagine sometimes). Don’t need $1M in liquidity and $2M of net worth for X. Also is an investment of roughly $1.5M-$2.5M for McD.If you own a McD franchise you will have invested at least a million but will also have millions in return. If you spend 1mil on a FX "franchise" you will owe 1 million dollars.
The NLRB did find them to be a co-employer, and McDonalds settled the claim to avoid a court ruling. As I said before in other places, huge corporations can break the law and avoid court when they want to by settling with an out of court payment.They were not held liable and McD was not found to be a co-employer.
Dano is head french fry boy.Because you work there now?
Sorry, couldn’t resist.
The NLRB did find them to be a co-employer, and McDonalds settled the claim to avoid a court ruling. As I said before in other places, huge corporations can break the law and avoid court when they want to by settling with an out of court payment.
McDonald's and NLRB reach settlement in joint-employer case
Did you read the link?????? The NLRB ruled them to be co-employers, and they setteld rather than go through an appeals process. Since it did not get ruled on in the justice system, it did not set a legal precedent, but if the NLRB is presented another case with similar facts, the NLRB would likely rule the same way.It was an allegation, and a highly dubious one at that, not a finding.
Did you read the link?????? The NLRB ruled them to be co-employers, and they setteld rather than go through an appeals process. Since it did not get ruled on in the justice system, it did not set a legal precedent, but if the NLRB is presented another case with similar facts, the NLRB would likely rule the same way.
The NLRB decided officially that McDonalds violated the rules. The would not have pursued the case without such a decision. If you want to argue that making a decision isn't the same as making a ruling, go ahead and twist it around in your small mind to fit your world view.
How do you get the routes for free?!Get the routes for free, build them up and sell them. Never buy into this.
You’ve been operating routes since ‘96? There are a lot of negative posts about being a contractor, and it not being a profitable business that you could lose at any time. Do you have any insights on linehaul vs P&D? I am evaluating whether or not to move from a paid position into this business as an opportunity and am trying to understand the reality of what contractor and ownership would be.Been running as a sub-S since ‘96. Pay myself salary plus distributions. Let my accountants tell me what to pay myself. It’s worked out well.
FEx pulled your contracts and you lost your business?Because I foolishly assumed this was a legitimate business opportunity and I owned my own company
Want to know what it's like? Perhaps I can help you. It falls in somewhere between trendy share cropping and politically correct slavery.You’ve been operating routes since ‘96? There are a lot of negative posts about being a contractor, and it not being a profitable business that you could lose at any time. Do you have any insights on linehaul vs P&D? I am evaluating whether or not to move from a paid position into this business as an opportunity and am trying to understand the reality of what contractor and ownership would be.