wilberforce15
Well-Known Member
White people could've been the thieves.Of course not. Must have been Arbery.
It's just that they weren't.
White people could've been the thieves.Of course not. Must have been Arbery.
and neither was Mr Arbery. and for like the tenth time even if he HAD stolen it in no way justifies the actions of those found guilty of murder.White people weren't the thieves.
Being a serial thief who was walking through somebody else's property, it is perfectly reasoanble to forcibly stop that person for law enforcement to investigate.and neither was Mr Arbery. and for like the tenth time even if he HAD stolen it in no way justifies the actions of those found guilty of murder.
They tried that defense, didnt work out too good for them lolStopping an innocent man with threat of force, and then using that force when attacked.
I know it didn't.They tried that defense, didnt work out too good for them lol
no,whats reasonable is to call the Police.Being a serial thief who was walking through somebody else's property, it is perfectly reasoanble to forcibly stop that person for law enforcement to investigate.
That's what they did.
Then he tried to kill them.
Stopping a thief with threat of force, and then using that force when attacked.
They didn't provoke the incident.Under Georgia law you don't get to provoke an incident and then claim self defense over the results.
erm, uh NO its rather because evidence was shown they murdered an innocent man because he was black.I hope they get the death penalty.I know it didn't.
And I knew it wouldn't work.
Becuase the judge and jury hate America and the law.
And it's just coincidence that you hate the law and America.erm, uh NO its rather because evidence was shown they murdered an innocent man because he was black.I hope they get the death penalty.
They didn't provoke the incident.
They were acting lawfully by using threat of force to detain a likely fleeing criminal. Perfectly legal. And it's not instigation or provocation.
Wow if only they had called this number 911 and said" we think this individual stole from a house, he is running down Santilla Shores ave . he hasa white shirt,tan shorts ,African american in his mid 20's" .......................i know that's a stretch, its hard for you to comprehend but had they done that he'd be alive and they wouldnt be bankrupt and in jail. I'll give you odds at least one of them gets killed in jail or prison, they have a HUGE target on themThey didn't provoke the incident.
They were acting lawfully by using threat of force to detain a likely fleeing criminal. Perfectly legal. And it's not instigation or provocation.
That was what got them convicted.Under Georgia law you don't get to provoke an incident and then claim self defense over the results.
Ya he was stealing. He went in and came out empty handed every time he went there. He never came back with a truck or a bag. Your an idiot man. Every chance you get to say something bad about a black or brown you will take it. If a thief is a horrible person what is a person that judges people by their skin color? The white people weren't there to steal??? Smh you're a fool.Stopping a thief with threat of force, and then using that force when attacked.
Yes it does.if he HAD stolen it in no way justifies the actions of those found guilty of murder.
No killing that guy got them convictedThat was what got them convicted.
In this particular case was theft ever proven? I saw no reports regarding Arbery having stolen property in his possession when he was killed.Stopping a thief with threat of force, and then using that force when attacked.