BigUnionGuy
Got the T-Shirt
I am not talking about an anomaly, rather a consistent pattern of abuse, much as the language was written and intended.
Yet somehow, the company is always let off the hook as if this work was somehow "extra work" and only paid to the extent of available hours for the grievant on the day in question.
We have strung scores of grievances in many centers, only to have it swept under the carpet for pennies on the dollar.
Until the panels hold the company financially responsible during these periods of under staffing, they will continue to intentionally use these DOT qualified part time drivers instead of hiring new full time drivers.
Your Local should take a more aggressive stance.
Repeated violations are an abuse of the language.
Why would the company hire new FT drivers for what is at best sporadic work?
With the new Master language.... it will be a lot easier for the Union to determine
whether it is sporadic incidences, or a pattern of short staffing.
Again, I'm not talking about isolated incidences, rather repeated violations.
Repeated violations, are worthy of discussions with an agent from the NLRB.
Then add in the fact that they violate when there are numerous full time drivers scheduled off???
That's BS.... that you have to constantly monitor it.
That should be the first question you ask.
-Bug-