Amy Coney Barrett

[Fred's Myth]

The framers intended the constitution to change over time. They never expected it to be revered as a religious text.

Source?

 

[JJinVA]

She 's also the least qualified pick in thirty years.

Im sure youre farrrrrrrr more qualified from your Youtube University studies of Sovereign Citizens lel

 

[It will be fine]

Source?

“I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and Constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.”
Thomas Jefferson

One among many quotes, feel free to look up more yourself.

 

[JJinVA]

“I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and Constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.”
Thomas Jefferson

One among many quotes, feel free to look up more yourself.

He said laws and institutions must advance, infact the quote starts with him saying he is NOT an advocate for frequent changes to Constitutions. Jesus Christ guy

But not only that, id interpret institutions as Universities. So I think we should follow his advice and get our Universities caught up to speed on Conservatism and leave the left in the past. Outdated tech...

 

[Old Man Jingles]

The 52 yes votes represent 17 million fewer voters than the 48 no’s. We need to reform the court and Mitch just gave us the reason.

I've never run across anyone who has such a problem understanding the difference between a democracy and a democratic republic.
Just amazing!

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

“I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and Constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.”
Thomas Jefferson

One among many quotes, feel free to look up more yourself.

They're called amendments.
Look it up and get back to us fren.

 

[It will be fine]

He said laws and institutions must advance, infact the quote starts with him saying he is NOT an advocate for frequent changes to Constitutions. Jesus Christ guy

But not only that, id interpret institutions as Universities. So I think we should follow his advice and get our Universities caught up to speed on Conservatism and leave the left in the past. Outdated tech...

Frequent, the implication being he is in favor of changes to laws and constitutions. This isn’t hard to follow. The constitution was never meant to be seen as perfect handed down by god.

 

[It will be fine]

"Happy for us that when we find our constitutions defective and insufficient to secure the happiness of our people, we can assemble with all the coolness of philosophers and set it to rights, while every other nation on earth must have recourse to arms to amend or to restore their constitutions." --Thomas Jefferson

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

"Happy for us that when we find our constitutions defective and insufficient to secure the happiness of our people, we can assemble with all the coolness of philosophers and set it to rights, while every other nation on earth must have recourse to arms to amend or to restore their constitutions." --Thomas Jefferson

They're called amendments.
Look it up and get back to us fren.

Ttku

 

[Wally]

The framers intended the constitution to change over time. They never expected it to be revered as a religious text.

It is not to be changed by some liberal judge, that's for sure.

 

[El Correcto]

"Happy for us that when we find our constitutions defective and insufficient to secure the happiness of our people, we can assemble with all the coolness of philosophers and set it to rights, while every other nation on earth must have recourse to arms to amend or to restore their constitutions." --Thomas Jefferson

With all due respect you are being a silly hysterical bitch.

 

[It will be fine]

It is not to be changed by some liberal judge, that's for sure.

Interpretation is what judges do. It’s literally their entire job. To pretend a “textual“ interpretation is any more valid than a progressive one is foolish.

 

[It will be fine]

With all due respect you are being a silly hysterical bitch.

I’m sorry our nation’s history upsets you so much. Context around the constitution matters in its interpretation.

 

[El Correcto]

I’m sorry our nation’s history upsets you so much. Context around the constitution matters in its interpretation.

You are losing it. You don’t respect Thomas Jefferson. To you he is nothing more than some of slave raping white man who helped institute white supremacy in America.

 

[It will be fine]

You are losing it. You don’t respect Thomas Jefferson. To you he is nothing more than some of slave raping white man who helped institute white supremacy in America.

Now who’s being a hysterical little bitch?

 

[El Correcto]

Now who’s being a hysterical little bitch?

What ever you say my little jamestownian.

 

[El Correcto]

"Happy for us that when we find our constitutions defective and insufficient to secure the happiness of our people, we can assemble with all the coolness of philosophers and set it to rights, while every other nation on earth must have recourse to arms to amend or to restore their constitutions." --Thomas Jefferson

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes.

That sums up the socialists movement democrats are seeking. To completely upend the most successful form of government the world has ever seen, for one of the worse forms the world has ever seen.

 

[vantexan]

The framers intended the constitution to change over time. They never expected it to be revered as a religious text.

They built in a process for change called amendments. You may have heard of them. That allows change, but not easy change by radicals.

 

[vantexan]

And when it comes to rigging courts at all federal levels nobody knows more about that than Mitch and his minions.

Harry Reid removed the filibuster for approving judges. Thought the Democrat controlled Senate with Obama would fill vacancies with liberal judges. Surprise!

 

[vantexan]

Frequent, the implication being he is in favor of changes to laws and constitutions. This isn’t hard to follow. The constitution was never meant to be seen as perfect handed down by god.

Your problem, one of many, is you see change as one sided. Your way or the highway. Elections have consequences. It's the president who nominates judges and justices. Not the majority of voters.