Amy Coney Barrett

bob_d

New Member
Scalia died 9 months before the election. Republicans said that is too close to having a new president. The new president should get the pick.
4 years later & and same situation except it is 6 weeks before the election. Republicans set the precedent last time. Now they are trying to say it is different. You could have the same picture above with the righties if you switched the years.
 

JJinVA

Well-Known Member
So who is Amy Coney Barrett? Take a good look , a real good look, and what you'll find is a female Brett Kavanaugh . Another preppy born to a white privileged well to do family who gets to go to an expensive, strictly private college and then on to Notre Dame on a full ride. How many ordinary young American women get to do that?

Now how in the hell is she going to be able to relate to struggling young women trying to better themselves entirely own their own and come from nothing in this the age of Trump and COVID?

If she votes to overturn the ACA and in doing so turning the fate of millions of no longer insured Americans back over to health insurers to pick and choose who they'll insure, who they won't, how much they'll charge. how little they'll pay AND votes to overturn Roe vs. Wade along with defunding Planned Parenthood then Trump just handed Congress over to the Democrats and there could be some REAL hard left members in that majority for the next 20 years.


I dont know if you know this or not, but, the Supreme Court deals strictly within the realm of, interpretations of the US Constitution. Not, about how much a baby momma is or isnt struggling. Youre thinking more along the Jerry Springer lines of justice.
 

It will be fine

Well-Known Member
Scalia died 9 months before the election. Republicans said that is too close to having a new president. The new president should get the pick.
4 years later & and same situation except it is 6 weeks before the election. Republicans set the precedent last time. Now they are trying to say it is different. You could have the same picture above with the righties if you switched the years.
Doesn’t matter. Republicans know they are hypocritical. At least they’ve made it easier to identify the truly stupid ones that spit out the nonsensical arguments about how this is a totally different scenario.
 

DriveInDriѵeOut

Inordinately Right
Scalia died 9 months before the election. Republicans said that is too close to having a new president. The new president should get the pick.
4 years later & and same situation except it is 6 weeks before the election. Republicans set the precedent last time. Now they are trying to say it is different. You could have the same picture above with the righties if you switched the years.
Scalia died 9 months before the election. Democrats said that is not too close to having a new president. The current president should get the pick. 4 years later & and same situation except it is 6 weeks before the election. Democrats set the precedent last time. Now they are trying to say it is different. You could have the same picture above with the lefties if you switched the years.
 

floridays

Well-Known Member
Sounds like a devout Catholic. Just like Biden and the Speaker of the House Pelosi. Can't imagine trumps base being very happy about his choice. Says she will follow the law and not her faith. Sounds like a closet liberal.
They are not confirming to follow the law.
Their oath is supposed to be to the Constitution.
Fishing twice in the same day, imagine that.
 

floridays

Well-Known Member
You sure Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi are devout Catholics?
Do they
Scalia died 9 months before the election. Republicans said that is too close to having a new president. The new president should get the pick.
4 years later & and same situation except it is 6 weeks before the election. Republicans set the precedent last time. Now they are trying to say it is different. You could have the same picture above with the righties if you switched the years.
You aren't a smart guy.
Exactly who held the Senate, exactly whom confirms?
You aren't smart.

Exactly who is nominating, exactly who controls the Senate that can confirm?
Did all democrats ride the short bus to school?
 

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage
So who is Amy Coney Barrett? Take a good look , a real good look, and what you'll find is a female Brett Kavanaugh .
Now how in the hell is she going to be able to relate to struggling young women trying to better themselves entirely own their own and come from nothing in this the age of Trump and COVID?
Sometimes you should stop and think about how wrong your posts are before hitting the "Post" button! SMH

That will not be her job!
Her job will be to judge the lawsuits that come before the SCOTUS based on the Constitution, Legislative Laws and Stare decisis ...
... and nothing else.​
Not how she feels about the case,
not how she reacts emotionally to the case,
not whose side she likes better and
not what is socially desirable.
 

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage
Sounds like a devout Catholic. Just like Biden and the Speaker of the House Pelosi. Can't imagine trumps base being very happy about his choice. Says she will follow the law and not her faith. Sounds like a closet liberal.
That's either really funny or really stupid!

Conservative Justices decide the case based on the Constitution, Legislative Laws and Stare decisis and nothing else.

Liberal Activist Justices do the same but they also apply a judicial philosophy that the courts can and should go beyond the applicable law to consider broader societal implications of its decisions.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Sometimes you should stop and think about how wrong your posts are before hitting the "Post" button! SMH

That will not be her job!
Her job will be to judge the lawsuits that come before the SCOTUS based on the Constitution, Legislative Laws and Stare decisis ...
... and nothing else.​
Not how she feels about the case,
not how she reacts emotionally to the case,
not whose side she likes better and
not what is socially desirable.
But it's impact on people who were not born to the same comfortable and privileged upbringing she was could be the ones most negatively impacted by her hard line conservative views. If the GOP somehow holds onto the Senate this year and she votes to strike down the two most impactful cases on the horizon , healthcare and reproductive rights and given the increasing political power of women and minorities the GOP might just come to regret putting this woman on the bench under the circumstances surrounding her appointment.

Don't think that they could be hell to pay for the GOP? Well, consider take at look at something here. According to a survey done by the Kaiser Family Foundation which is about as nonpolitical as it gets only 29% of Americans approve an overturning of Roe vs. Wade.
 

DriveInDriѵeOut

Inordinately Right
But it's impact on people who were not born to the same comfortable and privileged upbringing she was could be the ones most negatively impacted by her hard line conservative views.
That disgusting class warfare narrative that radical left wing neomarxist Democrats like yourself push is a pathetic attempt at avoiding discussion of her obvious qualification for the position.

Hurr durr, white privilege disqualifies her, we need some ghetto thug pimp as a supreme court justice, that's the only way to fix da system homie!



Freaking delusional radicals.
Smh
 

PT Car Washer

Well-Known Member
That's either really funny or really stupid!

Conservative Justices decide the case based on the Constitution, Legislative Laws and Stare decisis and nothing else.

Liberal Activist Justices do the same but they also apply a judicial philosophy that the courts can and should go beyond the applicable law to consider broader societal implications of its decisions.
I was thinking of David Souter who drifted to the liberal side towards the end of his career. Also Chief Justice Roberts has side with the liberal Justices many times in 5 to 4 decisions. Being appointed to life some Justices feel like they are no longer beholden to their political masters and can vote the law and consider societal implications. Consider Supreme Court decisions concerning slavery in the 1800's compared to civil rights cases in the 1960's. Do you propose that the Supreme Court reinstates slavery based on the Constitution in the 18th centaury? Or that we not allow women the right to vote?
 
Top