Non sequitur
Well-Known Member
I hadn't thought about the possibility of Merrick Garland getting a second shot at the court. Too bad he's a dirty white skin.
I hadn't thought about the possibility of Merrick Garland getting a second shot at the court. Too bad he's a dirty white skin.
I hadn't thought about the possibility of Merrick Garland getting a second shot at the court. Too bad he's a dirty white skin.
...and a male....
Under those robes who's to say different?True. But all he'd have to do to get around that in 2022 is declare himself a woman. Which would also earn him some stripes in the intersectional rankings.
You don't get it. It's perfectly fine to have a black female appointed. What's wrong is excluding everyone else. Could be the very best legal mind in the country who's willing to accept the position is a white male. Or a black male. Or an Asian woman. To say that it must be a black woman instead of the very best legal scholar available no matter who they are is wrong. But it seems you think that'll win you votes in elections. Just watched a Hispanic female justice make a fool of herself in recent deliberations saying things that were flat out untrue. I don't want people on the highest court of the land who are that uninformed. I want a proven body of work. It's obviously going to be a liberal so get one who can make rational decisions. I disagreed with Ruth Bader Ginsberg about plenty but she was a thoughtful person with a sharp legal mind. Not a token based on identity politics.A lot of White Males on here not happy about a Black Female being appointed…. Demographics win elections. Sad how you don’t get it. Such a simple idea to include ALL
A lot of White Males on here not happy about a Black Female being appointed…. Demographics win elections. Sad how you don’t get it. Such a simple idea to include ALL
Demographics win elections
What’s next? Trans, Furry, dogs?You don't get it. It's perfectly fine to have a black female appointed. What's wrong is excluding everyone else. Could be the very best legal mind in the country who's willing to accept the position is a white male. Or a black male. Or an Asian woman. To say that it must be a black woman instead of the very best legal scholar available no matter who they are is wrong. But it seems you think that'll win you votes in elections. Just watched a Hispanic female justice make a fool of herself in recent deliberations saying things that were flat out untrue. I don't want people on the highest court of the land who are that uninformed. I want a proven body of work. It's obviously going to be a liberal so get one who can make rational decisions. I disagreed with Ruth Bader Ginsberg about plenty but she was a thoughtful person with a sharp legal mind. Not a token based on identity politics.
Exactly. Eventually the Supreme Court will look like the bar in Star Wars if they think it'll get them votes.What’s next? Trans, Furry, dogs?
Both Reagan and Drumpf did exactly the same thing.You don't get it. It's perfectly fine to have a black female appointed. What's wrong is excluding everyone else. Could be the very best legal mind in the country who's willing to accept the position is a white male. Or a black male. Or an Asian woman. To say that it must be a black woman instead of the very best legal scholar available no matter who they are is wrong. But it seems you think that'll win you votes in elections. Just watched a Hispanic female justice make a fool of herself in recent deliberations saying things that were flat out untrue. I don't want people on the highest court of the land who are that uninformed. I want a proven body of work. It's obviously going to be a liberal so get one who can make rational decisions. I disagreed with Ruth Bader Ginsberg about plenty but she was a thoughtful person with a sharp legal mind. Not a token based on identity politics.
Someone thoughtful. Got it. Here Are All The Times Brett Kavanaugh Said He Likes Beer At His Senate Hearing On Sexual Assault AllegationsYou don't get it. It's perfectly fine to have a black female appointed. What's wrong is excluding everyone else. Could be the very best legal mind in the country who's willing to accept the position is a white male. Or a black male. Or an Asian woman. To say that it must be a black woman instead of the very best legal scholar available no matter who they are is wrong. But it seems you think that'll win you votes in elections. Just watched a Hispanic female justice make a fool of herself in recent deliberations saying things that were flat out untrue. I don't want people on the highest court of the land who are that uninformed. I want a proven body of work. It's obviously going to be a liberal so get one who can make rational decisions. I disagreed with Ruth Bader Ginsberg about plenty but she was a thoughtful person with a sharp legal mind. Not a token based on identity politics.
They will chose him..it’s a cult. Republicans bash women and minorities..that’s a poor strategyThere is a difference between a black female being appointed and a black female being appointed specifically because she's a black female. Biden has made it clear that the latter will be the case.
Democrats make such assumptions at their own peril. It certainly won't be true for them over the next couple years.
Try not to be mad as an *increasing number of dark skins choose to leave the Democratic plantation and join the dirty whites in opposing the Democrats' increasingly hard-left ridiculousness.
*all bets are off with this if the Republicans choose Orange Mussolini as their Presidential candidate in 2024.
Roe v Wade and is a business a person. That’s all Republican court appointments care about.Both Reagan and Drumpf did exactly the same thing.
Which judges did they appoint that didn't have an excellent record? Sandra Day O'Connor was a very respected judge.Both Reagan and Drumpf did exactly the same thing.
No they don't.They will chose him..it’s a cult. Republicans bash women and minorities..that’s a poor strategy
Well you're really on to something there. Even liberal professors at Harvard and elsewhere praised his legal mind. Guy wrote law school textbooks.
He’s an imbecile so…If Biden had had a smidgen of sense, he would have appointed a black woman without announcing that he would ONLY appoint a black woman. He turned whoever that appointee is into a token.
Include all is called equality.A lot of White Males on here not happy about a Black Female being appointed…. Demographics win elections. Sad how you don’t get it. Such a simple idea to include ALL