i don't think satoshi was talking about war, but if he was that's stupid because the reverse incentive would be extreme violence to INCREASE the loss of coins (by killing their owners) thus making the coins held by the violent more valuable
Notice the words “slightly” . As it eats asset $ and changes the mentality of working harder for broken $ there will be incentive to change. That change will be to negotiate instead of destroy. Having access to sound money will outweigh death temptation. Also violence is lessened when underlying asset is securitized properly. In addition to still being mined into year ~2140.
observablehq.com
Like a bad gf. She is not gonna let you have peace.
IMF says central bank digital currencies can replace cash: 'This is not the time to turn back'
Kristalina Georgieva of the IMF said that the public sector should keep preparing to deploy CBDCs and related payment platforms in the future.www.cnbc.com
the IMF!
cointelegraph.com
She’s not buying straight Bitcoin.
Buying straight would send it soaring. They accumulate (OTC) to stay undercover. In addition the window is closing bit by bit.
It’s a publicly traded fund with disclosed financials.
It would be foolish to apply for an ETF without having the asset. If they bought right out it would push the market. Makes no sense to apply then get the asset. That would be dumb. They use third party custody for securitization. I hope they don’t buy, but we know they already have. They ARE stacking a limited asset. By the time people realize it WILL run away from them.
