UPS Lifer
Well-Known Member
Oh, you looked up "murder by gun" and I just looked up murder. I guess murder by gun makes you more dead than just murder.
LOL! You slay me!
Oh, you looked up "murder by gun" and I just looked up murder. I guess murder by gun makes you more dead than just murder.
OK, I just looked at the stats for Murders by Gun crime:
SOURCE
Seventh United Nations Survey of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems, covering the period 1998 - 2000 (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Centre for International Crime Prevention)
DEFINITION
Total recorded intentional homicides committed with a firearm. ...
If you get murdered, you are dead.
It doesnt really matter whether you got shot, or stabbed, or clubbed, or beaten to death with a burrito or a bottle of maple syrup. The outcome is the same; the weapon used is irrelevant.
Using relevant statistics...the actual murder rate, irrespective of weapon choice....Mexico is #6 and the USA is #24.
This is the number that gives you your statistical probability of not being killed.
Interestly enough, Mexico still has a higher gun crime rate even though Mexican gun laws are far stricter than those in the USA...or even Canada for that matter. Perhaps the gun laws that disarm only the law-abiding arent working as well as their authors dreamed that they would.
In Canada, the use, ownership, or purchase of handguns is totally prohibited.
Actually, not true. Mexcans are allowed to buy and own hanguns, but can only keep them at home (as home protection).
.
Not really.
Article 10 of the Mexican Constitution does give Mexicans a theoretical right to keep handguns in their homes....but the wording also gives the government the unlimited ability to restrict that right to the point that it is worthless.
Article 10: The inhabitants of the United Mexican States have a right to arms in their homes, for security and legitimate defense, with the exception of arms prohibited by federal law and those reserved for the exclusive use of the Army, Navy, Air Force and National Guard. Federal law will determine the cases, conditions, requirements, and places in which the carrying of arms will be authorized to the inhabitants.
The reality.... is that guns of greater than.380 caliber are totally forbidden, and the the combination of licensing requirments, corruption, and a goverment monopoly on the sale of guns and ammunition (there is only one gun shop in the entire country) has net effect of making gun ownership virtually impossible for anyone except the wealthy and well-connected. And, of course, criminals.
You have every right to dislike guns Klein...but if you are going to post facts to support your position, please make sure those facts are accurate.
Guns in Canada aren't exactly forbidden. Only the elite can have them, correct?
Just curious. Are there no security guards in Canada? I'd be willing to bet that your elite can get handguns, but even if they can't they can probably hire armed security. Or not?
I'm just saying, us commoners could afford a handgun.... but certainly not an armed security guard. Is that how the Canadian elite take care of themselves?
"Canadian elite"
You've coined a new term !!!
You can own rifles (for hunting).
Handguns are totally forbidden.
There are fewer then 5 Canadians in the total country that have a legal temporary personal handgun. But, they are under witness protection, or some other major threat.
He just never gives up, does he?There are over 1 million legal, privately owned handguns in Canada.
This is approximately 1 handgun per 31 citizens.
This is a far higher rate of handgun ownership than you find in American cities such as Chicago and Washington DC, where handguns been banned for decades (although the recent Supreme Court ruling held the Washington DC ban to be unconstitutional.)
Interestlingly enough, these supposedly "gun free" cities have gun crime rates far higher than in states like Vermont and Alaska where gun ownership is unrestricted and where citizens are free to carry concealed handguns without any permit whatsoever.