The money to pay the expenses for educational conferences comes from the Trust Funds they are representing.
Hawaii is too extravagant for our Funds trustees, but that's the choice our guys have made. On the other hand theses venues offer opportunities to network with numerous agents that could increase fund values. (sounds a bit familiar)
Think of it like this; a small to average pension fund of say $500 million in invested assets has a assumption of 7.5% annual ROI. If union trustees (who receive no compensation from the funds they represent, but can be sued for not acting prudently, which includes failing to educate oneself) meet an investment manager who historically exceeds that ROI and they move their account to that manager, they could easily pay back their fund a hundredfold for the cost of their attendance at that conference. In my above scenario a 7.6 % one year ROI (one tenth of a pct increase over their assumed 7.5%) would be a difference of + $500,000 for their funds.
Many would think that's worth the trip.
So this particular organization's annual conference is the "only game in town"?
There is no other avenue for these officials to remain "educated" and network?
Enough people say no, often enough, and the venue would be more centralized and economically feasible in the future.
But that's not going to happen, is it?
I get everything you're saying, as my wife holds a degree that is worthless without being able to prove she has continued to educate herself in her field of study and would not be able to maintain her license in her vocation otherwise.
In the end, I can think of no "Funds trustees", from any vocation or company, that can justify an educational conference in Hawaii unless they reside there.
It's an abusive expenditure, and the Teamsters for sure, have no business traveling there under those pretenses ever, but especially now under present day circumstances.
This is just another example of the status quo that's gotta go.