upschuck
Well-Known Member
I use the straps to lift packages, at times, too.Safety first.
I use the straps to lift packages, at times, too.Safety first.
I don't see where this extra verbiage clarifies anything in an already vague and arbitrarily interpreted article?
That's unbelievable..
Trust me I know. I'm hoping for a roof rack....That's SOP anymore. Every truck is so blown out you can't fit anymore into them!
Most people don't realize what the original intent of 17-I was.... that cleans it up.
"Serious offenses" meant things like fighting, sexual harassment, etc.
But over the years, the company made it just about anything.
Putting in "named" cardinal sins.... severely limits the Unions ability to defend the member.
The analogy I've used before, is when you see attendance policies in some other contracts.
4 infractions = warning letter.
5 infractions = suspension.
6 infractions = discharge.
End of story.
No going to a Panel or arbitration. You're done.
-Bug-
I can see them using the protecting the company in a way that was not intended. The customer and employee part is fine.Most people don't realize what the original intent of 17-I was.... that cleans it up.
"Serious offenses" meant things like fighting, sexual harassment, etc.
But over the years, the company made it just about anything.
Putting in "named" cardinal sins.... severely limits the Unions ability to defend the member.
The analogy I've used before, is when you see attendance policies in some other contracts.
4 infractions = warning letter.
5 infractions = suspension.
6 infractions = discharge.
End of story.
No going to a Panel or arbitration. You're done.
-Bug-
How about distracted driving, speeding, rolling a stop sign, improper lane change, not using signals and flashers, not having your headlights on while your wipers are operating, excessive backing, and about any other perceived shortcoming while behind the wheel.I agree it cleans it up. The politicians are saying it’s worse. They don’t want to believe it’s better. 17i was intended to be the most extreme situations. Pulling to wrong load or mis sorts is not a 17i.
How about distracted driving, speeding, rolling a stop sign, improper lane change, not using signals and flashers, not having your headlights on while your wipers are operating, excessive backing, and about any other perceived shortcoming while behind the wheel.
Could those scenarios be perverted under this expanded language? I can envision my LM giving it a shot.
Give me a little while and I'm sure we can think of some similar scenarios when we aren't behind the wheel.
Oh...."egregious"???...I seeThe word egregious.... is the operative term.
What are some synonyms for "egregious"???
I know a couple....how about "serious" or "cardinal sin"?
"It's shameful you had late air, You're Fired".Nope.
e·gre·gious
əˈɡrējəs/
adjective
- 1.
outstandingly bad; shocking.
"egregious abuses of copyright"
synonyms: shocking, appalling, terrible, awful, horrendous, frightful, atrocious, abominable, abhorrent, outrageous;
monstrous, heinous, dire, unspeakable, shameful, unforgivable, intolerable, dreadful;
formalgrievous
"an egregious error of judgment"
Come on @Bubblehead....
You're starting to sound like "Conspiracy Theories" with Jessie Ventura.
List cardinal sins ?
Be careful of what you ask for.
Oh, that's a cardinal sin.... goodbye.... there's no negotiating after that.
-Bug-
Is that how it works for the "cardinal" infractions specifically listed in Article 17(a thru h)....goodbye....no negotiating after that???List cardinal sins ?
Be careful of what you ask for.
Oh, that's a cardinal sin.... goodbye.... there's no negotiating after that.
Just looking at the way the language reads If the temporary change involves more than a two-way split, the driver shall select by seniority", then I would assume you can follow whatever portion you want provided you have the seniority.Please elaborate. My route is frequently cut and I have 20 years driving seniority. I have filed a grievance and it went to panel and the outcome is still vague and nobody knows the actual language.
Section 9-Route Changes
(a) Temporary:
Other than the months of November and December period of November 15th through January 15th if a bid area is changed fifty percent (50%) or more, the employee shall have the right to follow the portion in excess of fifty percent (50%) of the delivery stops. If the temporary change involves more than a two-way split, the driver shall select by seniority.
It’s yhe bold part I dont get. They split my route up to four or more different routes and I have no idea where I am allowed to go. Do I have to follow my work? Follow the largest portion? Work as directed?
This is the one thing I wanted to see cleared up in our supplement.
Is that how it works for the "cardinal" infractions specifically listed in Article 17(a thru h)....goodbye....no negotiating after that?
Thanks. That’s the way I read it too. Been going on every Monday, sometimes more, for the last two years. Ever since we “lost Amazon”...Just looking at the way the language reads If the temporary change involves more than a two-way split, the driver shall select by seniority", then I would assume you can follow whatever portion you want provided you have the seniority.
Just looking at the way the language reads If the temporary change involves more than a two-way split, the driver shall select by seniority", then I would assume you can follow whatever portion you want provided you have the seniority.
I don't use this particular supplement, but language is language. I am pretty sure this is how it is broken down in the central region.That's exactly what it means.
Unfortunately not at my center. One big list. But hey, I do get to bump one full timer.Our PT and FT are totally separate on different lists.
Just looking at the way the language reads If the temporary change involves more than a two-way split, the driver shall select by seniority", then I would assume you can follow whatever portion you want provided you have the seniority.
What's the penalty when the Company refuses to abide by this language???That's exactly what it means.
Our local allows the attendance infraction limit without progressive discipline starting to be 6 infractions in a 9 month period.Well....
17-a) is cleaned up, and mirrors the National.
(we will call this the "what you talking about Willis" clause)
17-b) You're done. No exceptions.
17-c) Again.... done.
17-d) If you are tested per Article 18 and 35 (and are clean).... possible.
(Depending on your work record)
17-e) Circumstances can vary.
17-friend) There is an escape clause in that one.
17-g) Depends on the level of damage. You kill someone.... have a nice day.
17-h) That kind of is antiquated, and could be construed as meaning cash.
But, don't try and float a customer a loan with the promise of a check tomorrow.
My only point being....
Why pigeon hole yourself, with definitions ?
-Bug-