Chelsea Clinton

[Sportello]

You misplaced a decimal point on LaJolla, it was $11.86 million, and he tore it down to build a bigger home.

Park City UT $5million

SLC UT $1.2million

 

[moreluck]

You can disagree all you want, but what someone pays for their real estate is public record. You must be against people working hard and investing in real estate.......Did you also know that Mitt sold a few properties prior to running for pres?

http://www.zillow.com/blog/mitt-romneys-6-homes-70711/

 

[moreluck]

You misplaced a decimal point on LaJolla, it was $11.86 million, and he tore it down to build a bigger home.

Park City UT $5million

SLC UT $1.2million

Park City sold in 2009.....we're talkin' NOW !!!!
I was off on the LaJolla one........but we're talking purchase prices not what a re-build is worth.
What SLC home ????? If you are confusing that with Park City...proximity is close, but he sold it in 2009....which means he doesn't own it anymore.

I was a realtor in SLC and our office had listings in Park City too.

 

[olroadbeech]

im gonna kill myself.

 

[MrFedEx]

im gonna kill myself.

Can you take her with you?

 

[moreluck]

back to Chelsea.....with Hilary running for office, Bill and Chelsea are the only Clintons heading up the Clinton Foundation. Chelsea will not play a big part in her mother's campaign (she said so herself) because of her own "mommy duties".

 

[Sportello]

You can disagree all you want, but what someone pays for their real estate is public record. You must be against people working hard and investing in real estate.......Did you also know that Mitt sold a few properties prior to running for pres?

http://www.zillow.com/blog/mitt-romneys-6-homes-70711/

I have no problem with honest bazillionaires. You were insinuating that Chelsea Clinton was somehow tarnished because she married up. You then pulled home values out of thin air, rather than what Willard actually paid, and then improved upon. You also ignored the homes he's bought since he ran for POTUS. Those FACTS are easily verifiable.

Once again, I have no problem with bazillionaires who are honest. Willard is not. George Romney was a good man.

As I pointed out in another thread (if it makes it past the censor), there is no honest discussion here.

 

[The Other Side]

back to Chelsea.....with Hilary running for office, Bill and Chelsea are the only Clintons heading up the Clinton Foundation. Chelsea will not play a big part in her mother's campaign (she said so herself) because of her own "mommy duties".

Then why not leave her alone??

According to YOU and YOUR own logic, she is a private person and we shouldnt be talking about her. YOU said this many times about many people brought up on this board, but when it comes to YOU. Hypocrisy is king.

You wouldnt be so involved with Chelsea Clinton if your daily dose of FOX NEWS brainwashing didnt motivate you to do so.

TOS.

 

[olroadbeech]

Can you take her with you?

if I reply in the affirmative ill have a visit from the secret service or fbi , get an audit from the irs and her people will make my life a living hell so I quess I will only kill myself, thank you very much.

 

[moreluck]

I have no problem with honest bazillionaires. You were insinuating that Chelsea Clinton was somehow tarnished because she married up. You then pulled home values out of thin air, rather than what Willard actually paid, and then improved upon. You also ignored the homes he's bought since he ran for POTUS. Those FACTS are easily verifiable.

Once again, I have no problem with bazillionaires who are honest. Willard is not. George Romney was a good man.

As I pointed out in another thread (if it makes it past the censor), there is no honest discussion here.

Whatever!

 

[moreluck]

 

[moreluck]

 

[moreluck]

 

[The Other Side]

back to Chelsea.....with Hilary running for office, Bill and Chelsea are the only Clintons heading up the Clinton Foundation. Chelsea will not play a big part in her mother's campaign (she said so herself) because of her own "mommy duties".

For someone who insists that other posters leave "private persons" alone, you seem to be consumed gossiping about those very "private persons".

TOS.

 

[moreluck]

For someone who insists that other posters leave "private persons" alone, you seem to be consumed gossiping about those very "private persons".

TOS.

Chelsea is one of the 3 heads of the Clinton Foundation. With 'mom' on the campaign trail, she is half of the leadership of the Clinton Foundation.......hardly a private individual. When it comes to answering questions about the goings on at the Foundation, she would be a go to.

 

[brownmonster]

She earns money because of who her parents are. Some adult children milk their parents.

 

[moreluck]

She earns money because of who her parents are. Some adult children milk their parents.

That's exactly what the poster says........she earns money because of who her parents are......not because she has any talent or skill.
You picked that up all by yourself, did ya?

 

[Babagounj]

TOS , if Hillary wins the WH and bill's the first lady then that means chelsea will be left to be mom's bag man .

 

[moreluck]

 

[Babagounj]

Then why not leave her alone??

According to YOU and YOUR own logic, she is a private person and we shouldnt be talking about her. YOU said this many times about many people brought up on this board, but when it comes to YOU. Hypocrisy is king.

You wouldnt be so involved with Chelsea Clinton if your daily dose of FOX NEWS brainwashing didnt motivate you to do so.

TOS.

The same can be said about your abuse of the Palin family .