It sounds like she was really criticizing Israel and her university, but I’m not really bothered by anything that would normally fall under the first ammendment
@Box Ox posted one guy who wrote about eradicating the west or something like that and I can understand deporting him
But as far as I can see for this woman that
@rickyb posted, the only thing she did was coauthor a school article a year ago criticizing her universities involvement with Israel
“In March 2024, one year before her detention, Öztürk co-wrote an article in the university's newspaper
The Tufts Daily, entitled
Try again, President Kumar: Renewing calls for Tufts to adopt March 4 TCU Senate resolutions.
[6] The article called for the university to acknowledge "Palestinian genocide" and move away from companies with ties to
Israel because of the conflict in Gaza; the article was written by four students and endorsed by 32 others.
[7][8][9] The article wrote: "Credible accusations against Israel include accounts of deliberate starvation and indiscriminate slaughter of Palestinian civilians and plausible genocide." After the article was published, Öztürk's name, photograph and work history were published on
Canary Mission, a pro-Israeli organization that describes itself as documenting people who "promote hatred of the USA, Israel and Jews on North American college campuses."
[7][10]Friends of Öztürk believe that she was targeted because of this incident.
[11]”
“According to a government report that was released by anonymous sources on March 2025 and written days before Öztürk's arrest, the
United States Department of State (DOS) did not find evidence that Öztürk had engaged in
antisemitism or supported
terrorist organizations. The report also stated that a search of US government databases on Öztürk did not provide any information related to terrorism and due to the lack of evidence, the DOS and Secretary of State
Marco Rubio did not have sufficient grounds for revoking her visa.
[12][13]According to a copy of another report, the DHS had recommended for Öztürk's visa to be revoked under a provision of the
Immigration and Nationality Act that requires the Secretary of State to have "reasonable grounds" to believe someone's presence poses an "adverse policy consequence for the United States." A separate document showed that Öztürk's visa revocation would be "silent," meaning she would not be informed about it.
[14][15]”