diesel96
Well-Known Member
I can't believe you are saying this today. Have you not listened to the news in the last couple of day? First off, the huge bill for clothes was done while she was preparing for the introduction appearance at the convention, she didn't go out shopping, RNC workers did that(purchased with RNC money not contribution money). Another point, I really doubt the bill for her clothing will increase because a third of the clothes have never been unwrapped, they are stored in the cargo portion of the plane she travels in. One third has already been returned to the stores in question. That leaves a third that she is rotating wearing in he public appearances. Her hair dresser? I don't anything about that (and you don't either) other than what has been reported. Is this her personal operator or someone that the RNC hired? Who is she? If Obama's campaign asked you to travel with him around the country to provide a service would you do it for less than your normal income or would want to be paid at your regular rate? Plus, I really doubt this stylist is only doing Palin's hair and make up.
I can't believe we are even discussing this anyway. Is there not much more important things to discuss? Like.............. ah, shoot never mind.
The most insightful & intelligent post so far.
Uhhmm...You guys, the last time I checked, this Thread was Titled;
Re: Cost of Palin's look :
Maybe thats why we are talking about it. It's pretty excessive, it's border line criminal, and it's an oxy-maroon statement for everything Sarah Palin is portrayed to be.
Plus, have you ever heard a woman let someone else do her shopping.
What I like to know, if you'all feel there are more important things to discuss, then why are you stalking this thread?
Absolutely. It applies the same logic your libs have been applying on Bushs 8 years. If you hold bush accountable for what has occured during his 8 years in office then I'm sure you will also hold the congress responsible for the nuclear level destruction of this economy that has taken place in the past two years.
Considering how strong this economy was a mere two years ago this version of congress may in fact set a new record for economic destruction. You should be proud of your liberal leadership. No group has ever destroyed an economy so quickly.
If you keep repeating it, maybe you'll convince yourself it's actually true...Common practise of AM Conservative radio.
I believe the dems hold 75-85% of the blame. The markets all time high was Dec. 2007. The tsunami happened because the senate banking commitee has turned a blind eye over the last 4 years. It seems the the dems were covering up the problem and protecting the criminal activity of Raines.
Don't kid yourself 1989....One word sums it all up: GREED!