Jkloc420
Do you need an air compressor or tire gauge
yesamerica would be safer with a wall and bringing all the troops back home.
yesamerica would be safer with a wall and bringing all the troops back home.
im not necessarily saying a wall is a good idea, but its very likely safer than blowing up the world.
Because well fed populations put more demands on Earth's limited supplies .Lee Camp [Redacted]Verified account @LeeCamp 8h8 hours ago
We spend a trillion dollars on military every yr. The UN estimates it would take $30 Billion a year to end world hunger. Why not do that??
or does having people go hungry put more demands on the earth's limited supplies?Because well fed populations put more demands on Earth's limited supplies .
Wrong. A better theory would be: If you wish to stay on top military wise, then you better get your force in the best fighting condition. What good would all the training in the world be, if you never got to use it. Plus the nut job communist and jhadies are just asking for it. Think about it every emon has a complete captive audience and they send these poor fools to "their" paradise for the same dam reason every unscrupulous leader does, power!They know how much they get in contributions from defense companies, and they know their constituents who work in the military industrial complex love their government subsidized jobs. It's not about defense, it's about money. If anything, our international presence makes us less safe, not more.
wutWrong. A better theory would be: If you wish to stay on top military wise, then you better get your force in the best fighting condition. What good would all the training in the world be, if you never got to use it. Plus the nut job communist and jhadies are just asking for it. Think about it every emon has a complete captive audience and they send these poor fools to "their" paradise for the same dam reason every unscrupulous leader does, power!
we need one with lasers and sharksim not necessarily saying a wall is a good idea, but its very likely safer than blowing up the world.
There are a lot of wealthy countries out there. If hunger could end with $30 Billion a year then why hasn't it happened?Lee Camp [Redacted]Verified account @LeeCamp 8h8 hours ago
We spend a trillion dollars on military every yr. The UN estimates it would take $30 Billion a year to end world hunger. Why not do that??
thats what im wondering!There are a lot of wealthy countries out there. If hunger could end with $30 Billion a year then why hasn't it happened?
is BMOC the right description of being an empire?Ricky and others are trying to create a utopian society which isn't a bad thing. My point is, absent any help from other countries we are stuck being the bmoc. That doesn't happen unless you prove your abilities from time to time.
Cheap laborThere are a lot of wealthy countries out there. If hunger could end with $30 Billion a year then why hasn't it happened?
msg deleted but ill say they control people with fear so if u can make people afraid of going hungry, or afraid of starvation then you can keep them under control.There are a lot of wealthy countries out there. If hunger could end with $30 Billion a year then why hasn't it happened?
that would be hilarious and america could afford it.we need one with lasers and sharks
wasteBlack ops
Dude our economy is only worth so much and the government only takes in so much. The idea that there's 10's of trillions of Dollars being spent with no accountability is ludicrous. Billions yes. Trillions? And you believe that?waste
yea i do and this is not the first time this has happened.Dude our economy is only worth so much and the government only takes in so much. The idea that there's 10's of trillions of Dollars being spent with no accountability is ludicrous. Billions yes. Trillions? And you believe that?