A response that has nothing to do with fraud? Must be more going on than I know or care about.
Whatever. Both try to steal elections. Bunch of bags. Simple.
Agreed. Not exactly "fair and balanced" either.
So lue posts about democrats committing fraud but has nothing to say when TOS links to a Madison case?
luci's opening sentence portrayed the democrats as the "only" party who's involved in election scandals. Everyone knows this is not true. BOTH parties have always been involved in some kind of election scandals over decades.
Ok so in the future, anytime a Dem is gulity of something then i will find a Republican doing the same and point that out also. WILL YOU DO THE SAME, OR WILL YOU CONTINUE TO BE A TOTAL HYPOCRITE???
No. If you would like to take it up here, fine. If diesels were to be profitable en masse in the U.S., we would have them. If the market for 48mpg cars were much larger than for 37mpg cars we would have them. But that is not the market in this country. Do you think that Ford doesn't bring diesels for any reason other than market forces of supply and demand? Government regulation? What? Ford engineers are not up to the task but VW engineers are? VW has built their demand (a niche as it were) over the years. Ford can and will do the same with the Eco-boost line. Frankly the technology, such as turbo charging and direct injection, are much the same as with diesels but the demand in the U.S. is more gasoline friendly. Again, does Ford care whether their vehicles run on gasoline or diesel? No. They care that they sell at a profit.I guess you could say its akin to you going suddenly quiet when I destroyed your argument in the compact truck thread huh?
The rest of the news doesn't use it as a tag-line.And the rest of the news out there is fair and balanced?
As a matter of fact, I don't read many of TOS's posts. Too long for me. Same with Wk. (SorryWk.)And many of your posts have nothing to do with the subject at hand...just attacks...but thats OK for you and your Buddy TOS? And there is MUCH more going on but you dont know or care about. When a BC member constantly is called out for personal attacks, accusations, lies, and missinformation and continues to run and hide, i guess thats OK with you since its your buddy? Yet you dont know or care....ummmm...OK.
No. If you would like to take it up here, fine. If diesels were to be profitable en masse in the U.S., we would have them. If the market for 48mpg cars were much larger than for 37mpg cars we would have them. But that is not the market in this country. Do you think that Ford doesn't bring diesels for any reason other than market forces of supply and demand? Government regulation? What? Ford engineers are not up to the task but VW engineers are? VW has built their demand (a niche as it were) over the years. Ford can and will do the same with the Eco-boost line. Frankly the technology, such as turbo charging and direct injection, are much the same as with diesels but the demand in the U.S. is more gasoline friendly. Again, does Ford care whether their vehicles run on gasoline or diesel? No. They care that they sell at a profit.
The basis is profit. If companies believed it woud be significantly profitable to put diesels in lower end lines, they would do so. As to where I was wrong, yes, VW sells more diesel jettas than gasoline. However, the percentage of diesel passenger cars sold in the U.S. remains about the same year after year. There is no outcry for a huge influx of diesel passenger vehicles in this country.
I would own an Audi A3 TDI right now, if I could have found one on the East Coast when I was looking. Instead, my Volvo was marked down almost $15,000.The basis is profit. If companies believed it woud be significantly profitable to put diesels in lower end lines, they would do so. As to where I was wrong, yes, VW sells more diesel jettas than gasoline. However, the percentage of diesel passenger cars sold in the U.S. remains about the same year after year. There is no outcry for a huge influx of diesel passenger vehicles in this country.
I would own an Audi A3 TDI right now, if I could have found one on the East Coast when I was looking. Instead, my Volvo was marked down almost $15,000.
So, I bought that as a second choice.
As a matter of fact, I don't read many of TOS's posts. Too long for me. Same with Wk. (SorryWk.)
Have you read all the posts?
I, bbsam, of somewhat noble lineage and far less noble moral character, do hereby submit my most humble of apologies to he known as Lue C Fur on this the eve of the celebration of the birth othe one true Lord and Savior who hat commanded of me, his most humble of servants, that I shall at all times and in all places abmit my loathesome failings not only to Him. But also to my fellow man that I may know true freedom, life and happiness so help me God since we are both ready for some football and getting ready to rumble all for our love of logistics, Amen.
Alan Byer Volvo, Syracuse, NY.And what company wants to mark a car down $15 grand just to move it out the door? I simply maintain that if car companies thought they could make a healthy profit by bringing more and more diesels to market, they would do so. If, however, they have to discount it by more than twice what the diesel option listed for in order to sell it, where is the profit motive?