Wage increases were worse than the 02 contract. Shouldn’t we be progressing especially in this economic climate? Sorry but the starting rate was needed by the company and isn’t something that will help us members vote yes, we needed that extra bump not just new hires. You failed, how can a 3 year person make the same as a brand new hire. You failed on skilled pay language. You failed on 22.4. Take your made up 14.5 billion number and go back to the table.Healthcare and pension stayed the same or got better for most. Wages went up. The starting rate was greatly improved. Between 7 thousand and 8 thousand new full time jobs were created. The day after thanksgiving is still double time except for a place in New York. Article 37 has a penalty pay of up to 24 hours at any step of the grievance procedure. I don’t see the concessions and the general public won’t either. A no vote on this current contract is a vote to strike. Don’t say I didn’t tell you so.
Or vote no and watch full timers bump you off your job, yes 1 full timer will displace 2 part timers due to volume loss. UPS is changing if we vote no.Wage increases were worse than the 02 contract. Shouldn’t we be progressing especially in this economic climate? Sorry but the starting rate was needed by the company and isn’t something that will help us members vote yes, we needed that extra bump not just new hires. You failed, how can a 3 year person make the same as a brand new hire. You failed on skilled pay language. You failed on 22.4. Take your made up 14.5 billion number and go back to the table.
Before a FT can bump a PT he must first have more company seniority. Have fun loading those trailers.Or vote no and watch full timers bump you off your job, yes 1 full timer will displace 2 part timers due to volume loss. UPS is changing if we vote no.
Wage increases were worse than the 02 contract.
Shouldn’t we be progressing especially in this economic climate?
How can a 3 year person make the same as a brand new hire.
Not beneath me, whatever pays the bills.Before a FT can bump a PT he must first have more company seniority. Have fun loading those trailers.
I think we might have a higher part time voter turnout out this contract....but I'm not holding my breath too long.Well, an .85 difference isn't much over the course of a five year contract. (2002 - 2018)
Especially considering, Health & Welfare and Pension contributions have significantly
increased since then.
The proposed increases' are better than the last contract, with no split raises.
Is that a concession ? Again, more contributions for benefits.
I'm sure everyone has heard the expression;
"One bad apple, doesn't spoil the whole bunch."
Unfortunately, for the part-timers.... it does.
When you have such a high turn-over rate, coupled with existing employees not bothering
to show up to work (on any given day) and the fact they don't vote....
What are people realistically expecting ?
-Bug-
I'm sure everyone has heard the expression;
"One bad apple, doesn't spoil the whole bunch."
I think we might have a higher part time voter turnout out this contract....but I'm not holding my breath too long.
Before a FT can bump a PT he must first have more company seniority.
I was hoping for a better turnout than the 39% we had last time.Even with all the belligerent posts' you see on the internet, and the "vote no" facebook
page boasting it's number of members.... UPS members voting participation is consistent.
In the Central Region.... Yep.
But, a person has to consider their options.
Even a low seniority full-timer is probably going to have seniority over most part-timers.
It could be more advantageous to file for unemployment.
But then, some will need the medical benefits.
Kind of a "flip of the coin" situation depending on the persons needs.
-Bug-
Oh, you're quoting the Osmonds' song.
I can’t wait till you see what the alternative is.Wage increases were worse than the 02 contract. Shouldn’t we be progressing especially in this economic climate? Sorry but the starting rate was needed by the company and isn’t something that will help us members vote yes, we needed that extra bump not just new hires. You failed, how can a 3 year person make the same as a brand new hire. You failed on skilled pay language. You failed on 22.4. Take your made up 14.5 billion number and go back to the table.
I was hoping for a better turnout than the 39% we had last time.
You can't make it any easier to vote, unless you you ask members to raise their hand at the PCMPeople don't understand how frustrating that is.
"Oh, your members are dissatisfied.... why don't they vote ?"
(says the company)
Isn't it cool, that TDU publishes all this information ?
They are disillusioned, in the fact, they think their inexperience.... helps ?
You can't make it any easier to vote
Unless you you ask members to raise their hand at the PCM
I was being sarcasticAside, from holding their hand ?
That's none of of the companies business.
They (or anyone) is not privy, to how a member votes.