You clearly don't understand The Constitution, the three branches of government, or the judicial branch's role in relation to The Constitution.
I have read NOTHING into any part of The Constitution. One does not need to if they understand and respect what it actually says. The right to KEEP and BEAR arms is quite crystal clear. As is the rest of the document.
Your implied expertise in the constitution is plagued by inaccuracies as usual.
You write this:
"The right to
KEEP and BEAR arms"
you capitalize the T in the giving the sense that this is a stand alone sentence, and therefore has its own independent meaning.
But as we already discussed, that sentence does not exist in the second amendment as a STAND ALONE sentence, and it is merely a "fragment" of another sentence.
Recapping, the second amendment has a preamble,
A Well Regulated Militia, (comma) Thats called the subject. Then the COMMA, which means that everything after the preamble is QUALIFIES the preamble.
To you, english or punctuation doesnt exist
Lets read it together:
A Well Regulated Militia, (preamble/subject)(comma)
being necessary for the security of the state,(Qualifier of subject)(comma)
the right of the people to keep and bear arms,(Qualifier of subject)(comma)
shall not be infringed.(Qualifier of subject)(period)
TO people like you, you take the third fragment out of the entire sentence and give it a stand alone meaning and interpretation. You want to ignore the two commas in front of the fragment but want to include the last fragment into the third fragment.
In other words, you want us to believe that the third and fourth fragments are connected by the comma and apply to one another, but the first two fragments separated by a comma and in front of the third fragment have no connection.
This is the kind of lunacy of the those who think they can interpret verbage.
I will agree, that for now, guns are allowed by the states and the states can regulate them at will. But the second amendment isnt as clear as you would want to portray.
Thanks to gun lobbies, and republican leaning supreme court justices, you still have the right to own guns.
Someday , that might change. Who knows.
But like the second amendment, you dont understand or comprehend the 1st amendment either.
The Oklahoma Supreme Court has ruled, its interpretations are the same as mine and others, and it doesnt side with YOU or your thoughts regardless of what you think.
YOU are wrong on the issue and all the foot stomping in the world isnt going to change it.
Maybe an english lit class may help.
Let me leave you with this, and you tell me what I am talking about:
"Overpaid Union thug, a member of the teamsters, working for United Parcel Service, shall not be prohibited from driving a package car".
TOS.
