newfie
Well-Known Member
That is not a compelling article. It just says, "this one guy thinks this one report is inaccurate." No explanation or anything to back it up.
That is not a compelling article. It just says, "this one guy thinks this one report is inaccurate." No explanation or anything to back it up.
There's also thisya, but how do you explain the sea level rising 200ft over the last 11,000 years?
Does Wikipedia still allow unknown persons to edit pages ?
Your story says both The Daily Mail and the Daily Mail online are unreliable sources .There's also this
Wikipedia bans Daily Mail because it's an 'unreliable source'
Wikipedia has determined the daily mail to be an unreliable source. So the entire article should be taken with a grain of salt. There might be some truth to it, but this presentation is likely skewed at best, totally fabricated at worst.
I thought it was the Chinese making up climate change?
If scientists are all liberal it's probably because they are educated. The more education one has the more likely they have a liberal worldview.
American republicans are literally the only group on the planet that denies climate change. Stand strong in your uneducated easily demonstrably false conviction that the world is not warming.
There's also this
Wikipedia bans Daily Mail because it's an 'unreliable source'
Wikipedia has determined the daily mail to be an unreliable source. So the entire article should be taken with a grain of salt. There might be some truth to it, but this presentation is likely skewed at best, totally fabricated at worst.
Back in the 60's the government tried to convince us it was the Russians who were manipulating the weather.
Do the Russians own Wikipedia?weird, a Russian owns independent.co
Do the Russians own Wikipedia?
Does Wikipedia still allow unknown persons to edit pages ?
for someone making such a compelling argument discounting and denying news sources you disagree with .you suddenly seem to be somewhat confused.
The only real and reliable source for accurate new is Breitbart. Fox is too fair and balanced to be credible.
one reason you liberals lost is because you make serious miss assessments about the opposing point of view. one of our favorite is the fox line.
you guys lost the presidency and both sides of congress in 8 years, you will lose the supreme court and over 100 judgeships.
republicans have approximately 35 governorships and most state legislatures.
did I mention over 1000 counties went our way?
please do me a favor keep believing the fox news line your master is feeding you and keep believing that Pelosi and schumer will fix your party.
I feel like we are playing tackle football against a flag football team. Its so unfair the way we kick your rears but dang its fun.
Speaking of Schumer, tomorrow is Sunday and that means a Press Conference from him. This is long standing tradition with him. On a slow news day , he is guaranteed more airtime in the media and I wonder what he will talk about, could be trivial , could be HUUGE.