Go get them John Durham ! Make those arrests

[UnionStrong]

You win.

Michael Sussmann found not guilty of lying to FBI in Durham investigation | CNN Politics

Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann was acquitted Tuesday of lying to the FBI, in the first trial of special counsel John Durham's investigation.

www.cnn.com

"Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann was acquitted Tuesday of lying to the FBI, in the first trial of special counsel John Durham's investigation.

The verdict is a major defeat for Durham and his Justice Department prosecutors, who have spent three years looking for wrongdoing in the Trump-Russia probe. He claimed Sussmann lied during a 2016 meeting in which he passed a tip to the FBI about Donald Trump and Russia.

The Washington, DC, federal jury deliberated for six hours over two days before reaching its verdict."

Next trials aren’t in DC

 

[Box Ox]

Next trials aren’t in DC

Haven't read about those yet and CNN hasn't mentioned.

 

[vantexan]

Next trials aren’t in DC

Thank goodness.

 

[bbsam]

Next trials aren’t in DC

Why would that matter?

 

[UnionStrong]

Thank goodness.

Maybe it will be a fair trial. No scumbags on the jury

 

[oldngray]

It would be very difficult to get a conviction there but the important thing was exposing the corruption and collusion between Hillary campaign and the FBI/DOJ

 

[UnionStrong]

View attachment 386409

It would be very difficult to get a conviction there but the important thing was exposing the corruption and collusion between Hillary campaign and the FBI/DOJ

Full of Jack asses

 

[bbsam]

Maybe it will be a fair trial. No scumbags on the jury

You blame the jury because they come up with a verdict you disagree with?

 

[oldngray]

Full of Jack asses

The judge did everything possible to hamstring Durham combined with the jury that were so biased should have been a mistrial

 

[oldngray]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1529958022822432773

 

[Box Ox]

You blame the jury because they come up with a verdict you disagree with?

I'm ready to blame a jury if they don't return a verdict for Johnny Depp.

 

[UnionStrong]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1529958022822432773

That’s fair….. Only an imbecile or a leftist loon would think that’s fair.

 

[vantexan]

You blame the jury because they come up with a verdict you disagree with?

90% of DC voters are Democrats. Everyone on this jury is a Democrat including some who donated to her campaign. Jonathan Turley, a law professor who says he's a liberal Democrat, said the evidence against Sussman was overwhelming. It's just like the juries in D.C. that let off criminals no matter the evidence.

 

[UnionStrong]

90% of DC voters are Democrats. Everyone on this jury is a Democrat including some who donated to her campaign. Jonathan Turley, a law professor who says he's a liberal Democrat, said the evidence against Sussman was overwhelming. It's just like the juries in D.C. that let off criminals no matter the evidence.

All the Jan. 6 people were convicted in the time it took to order lunch. Democrats suck. All of them.

 

[vantexan]

All the Jan. 6 people were convicted in the time it took to order lunch. Democrats suck. All of them.

Except Joe Manchin.

 

[bbsam]

I'm ready to blame a jury if they don't return a verdict for Johnny Depp.

Well, yeah!

 

[UnionStrong]

Except Joe Manchin.

He’s pushing a spending bill now, so yeah, he sucks too.

 

[bbsam]

90% of DC voters are Democrats. Everyone on this jury is a Democrat including some who donated to her campaign. Jonathan Turley, a law professor who says he's a liberal Democrat, said the evidence against Sussman was overwhelming. It's just like the juries in D.C. that let off criminals no matter the evidence.

You understand how juries are selected?

 

[vantexan]

You understand how juries are selected?

I do. And obviously this was the best they could come up with in D.C.

 

[vantexan]

He’s pushing a spending bill now, so yeah, he sucks too.

Hadn't heard that. Joe Biden! Joe Manchin!