GOP Rep. Michael McCaul calls Tommy Tuberville’s military promotions blockade a 'national security problem'

[Next Day Err]

A distinction without a difference.
Your argument is specious.
Tubberville is right to argue this issue.

The distinction is a legitimate distinction.

The military wants a soldier or sailor to get healthcare so they can sooner get back to work. It's about national security. But they aren't paying for the procedure itself so righties can stamp their feet all they want and pull the neckbeard hairs out of their necks but it doesn't change the fact that the federal government isn't paying for abortions.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

righties can stamp their feet all they want and pull the neckbeard hairs out of their necks but it doesn't change the fact that the federal government isn't paying for abortions.

Lefties can cry out for their blood sacrifice and pull the blue hair out of their brainwashed noggins but it doesn't change the fact that the federal government is violating the Hyde amendment.

Tubberville is right to force a debate, and make you people defend spending taxpayer money on abortion related expenses.

 

[Sportello]

https://www.justice.gov/d9/2022-11/2022-10-03-dod-abortion-transportation.pdf

 

[Next Day Err]

Lefties can cry out for their blood sacrifice and pull the blue hair out of their brainwashed noggins but it doesn't change the fact that the federal government is violating the Hyde amendment.

Tubberville is right to force a debate, and make you people defend spending taxpayer money on abortion related expenses.

I guess the military shouldn’t pay wages to soldiers and sailors either, then, since because they might spend some of it on reproductive healthcare.

I guarantee if a Republican gets elected this blockade on promotions would stop immediately. This isn’t really about Hyde. This is about raw power. Radical Republicans only want people in positions of authority within the military that won’t say “no“.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

The distinction is a legitimate distinction.

Is this a legitimate distinction?
Or is it a distinction without a difference?

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

I guarantee if a Republican gets elected this blockade on promotions would stop immediately. This isn’t really about Hyde. This is about raw power. Radical Republicans only want people in positions of authority within the military that won’t say “no“.

The promotions could happen today.
Democrats are choosing to not go forward with them individually because they want to get their sheep riled up.

Every single Democrats voted to legalize abortion up until the moment before birth.

Most Americans oppose that, and most Americans oppose taxpayer money being spent on abortion.

The radical extremist Democrat party is out of step with the American people.

 

[catstalking]

The military policy to aide a woman seeking reproductive healthcare only covers the cost of travel, not the procedure itself.

Your argument is specious.

it's not "reproductive healthcare", it's infanticide

 

[Next Day Err]

it's not "reproductive healthcare", it's infanticide

Radical and out of touch with everyday people’s attitudes and experiences. Whatever. Keep losing elections over this issue. Doesn’t bother me.

 

[Next Day Err]

Is this a legitimate distinction?
Or is it a distinction without a difference?

View attachment 445989

What an impressive internet sleuth you are!

 

[catstalking]

Radical and out of touch with everyday people’s attitudes and experiences. Whatever. Keep losing elections over this issue. Doesn’t bother me.

notice you don't deny it's infanticide, just went straight to the ~current year~ political mumbo jumbo

 

[Next Day Err]

notice you don't deny it's infanticide, just went straight to the ~current year~ political mumbo jumbo

Women are the gatekeepers of life. Always have been. Always will be. Get over it.

 

[catstalking]

Women are the gatekeepers of life. Always have been. Always will be. Get over it.

so women alone should decide who lives and who dies? that's bull, just lazy morality for someone who refuses to think this issue through

 

[Next Day Err]

so women alone should decide who lives and who dies? that's bull, just lazy morality for someone who refuses to think this issue through

Women alone have fetuses growing in them, so yes, they get to decide on their own health matters.

 

[catstalking]

Women alone have fetuses growing in them, so yes, they get to decide on their own health matters.

again, lazy moral copout

they don't get to decide the fate of others, especially when they chose to get pregnant

 

[Next Day Err]

again, lazy moral copout

they don't get to decide the fate of others, especially when they chose to get pregnant

Some don’t choose to get pregnant. Some want to be pregnant but the fetus will kill them. Some fetuses die and need to be removed for the mother’s wellbeing. Sometimes you should mind your own business.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

The government is using taxpayer money for elective abortion related expenses.

These radical extremist Democrats immediately deflect to talking about the small number of cases where it's medically necessary, because they cannot defend their position honestly.

The Hyde amendment doesn't even prohibit money spent when it's medically necessary. Talking about that is a disingenuous deflection. Nothing more.

 

[catstalking]

Some don’t choose to get pregnant. Some want to be pregnant but the fetus will kill them. Some fetuses die and need to be removed for the mother’s wellbeing. Sometimes you should mind your own business.

those cases are a whopping 2% of abortions, the other 98% being for economic or social issues

basically no one cares if those 2% are actually aborted, what is REALLY being discussed are the millions of lives ended so that Mary Jane can continue being a whore

that's literal infanticide and you're a lazy moralist for trying to put vaginas on some nonsense moral pedestal that allow them to kill at will

 

[Next Day Err]

those cases are a whopping 2% of abortions, the other 98% being for economic or social issues

basically no one cares if those 2% are actually aborted, what is REALLY being discussed are the millions of lives ended so that Mary Jane can continue being a whore

that's literal infanticide and you're a lazy moralist for trying to put vaginas on some nonsense moral pedestal that allow them to kill at will

I’m saying that they should be able to kill at will. It’s part of their bodies. Fetuses don’t have rights.

 

[vantexan]

I’m saying that they should be able to kill at will. It’s part of their bodies. Fetuses don’t have rights.

Kill at will? Why is it legally when a pregnant woman is murdered the murderer is charged with two murders? A fetus isn't an appendix. It's a separate human being that its mother is host to. It's her duty to safely bring it into the world. There's few things in life more selfish and irresponsible than to have unprotected sex then say just get rid of the consequences as if that new life is just an inconvenience.

 

[catstalking]

I’m saying that they should be able to kill at will. It’s part of their bodies. Fetuses don’t have rights.

lol there it is, thanks for proving me right

Infanticide is the intentional killing of infants or offspring.