HOFFA , HALL AND OBRIEN campaign announcement

wide load

Starting wage is a waste of time.
It matters how, in regards to the upcoming General Election?

Did you guys ever consider that you "legitimize" TDU when you jump to these tangents?
You don't feel that a guy that was a teamster for a year that now makes money off current teamsters sounds a little off? That his involvement to divide the group in order to promote his political agenda? What I find the most compelling is that his vow for socialism is dwarfed by his business model, complete capitalism.
 

Bubblehead

My Senior Picture
You don't feel that a guy that was a teamster for a year that now makes money off current teamsters sounds a little off? That his involvement to divide the group in order to promote his political agenda? What I find the most compelling is that his vow for socialism is dwarfed by his business model, complete capitalism.
He sounds like most UPS managers that I know?
I personally am not a member of TDU.
I don't have their website bookmarked, nor do I visit it often.
Been to a couple of their conventions on business.

My point is as it has always been, if they weren't selling a viable service or product, then they would cease to exist.
I'm guessing that their current membership numbers are larger than they have ever been.
 
I'm guessing that their current membership numbers are larger than they have ever been.[/QUOTE]
I think that it's not as big as you would think. If you look at most of their pictures they are either old pics that sho a good amount of members or they huddle all together. They had a meeting close to where I am from. Suck Sylvester and whoever is in there click were greater by all of four other teamsters. It is freaking hilarious. They always claim very high support and turnouts but would they ever say the turnout was poor.
 

BigUnionGuy

Got the T-Shirt
My point is as it has always been, if they weren't selling a viable service or product, then they would cease to exist.


Selling a service ?

It's more like.... extracting a monetary penalty, from the gulible. :biggrin:


I'm guessing that their current membership numbers are larger than they have ever been.


Paid members ? Nah.

Sympathizers ? More likely.

But, even those people are flakey. (they come and go.... on a whim)


I think that it's not as big as you would think. If you look at most of their pictures they are either old pics that show a good amount of members or they huddle all together.


(Photographer);

"Now squeeze in for the shot, look unhappy.... and mean".

They always claim very high support and turnouts but would they ever say the turnout was poor.


Ask 10 different TDU people, and you will get 10 different answers.



-Bug-
 

10 point

Well-Known Member
I'm guessing that their current membership numbers are larger than they have ever been.
I think that it's not as big as you would think. If you look at most of their pictures they are either old pics that sho a good amount of members or they huddle all together. They had a meeting close to where I am from. Suck Sylvester and whoever is in there click were greater by all of four other teamsters. It is freaking hilarious. They always claim very high support and turnouts but would they ever say the turnout was poor.[/QUOTE]
Probably as poor as the average percentile of teamsters that vote for contracts and leadership?
I don't see how. I love dogs. Dogs are some of the best people. Anyone who don't like dogs has got issues.
That was dogfish and Stonefish. Dogs rule.
 

Bubblehead

My Senior Picture
I'm guessing that their current membership numbers are larger than they have ever been.
I think that it's not as big as you would think. If you look at most of their pictures they are either old pics that sho a good amount of members or they huddle all together. They had a meeting close to where I am from. Suck Sylvester and whoever is in there click were greater by all of four other teamsters. It is freaking hilarious. They always claim very high support and turnouts but would they ever say the turnout was poor.[/QUOTE]
I wouldn't know and wonder how you would?
The picture they continue to use of me was in a full room for sure.
 
I think that it's not as big as you would think. If you look at most of their pictures they are either old pics that sho a good amount of members or they huddle all together. They had a meeting close to where I am from. Suck Sylvester and whoever is in there click were greater by all of four other teamsters. It is freaking hilarious. They always claim very high support and turnouts but would they ever say the turnout was poor.
I wouldn't know and wonder how you would?
The picture they continue to use of me was in a full room for sure.[/QUOTE]
Actually I'm pretty sure you told me the turn out was very light at those events a while back.
 
Top