DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
No point in thinking that far ahead we can't fathom the possibilities.Yours is. I don't think the generation after will be able to make a career in driving.
Technological singularity - Wikipedia
No point in thinking that far ahead we can't fathom the possibilities.Yours is. I don't think the generation after will be able to make a career in driving.
This guyNo point in thinking that far ahead we can't fathom the possibilities.
Technological singularity - Wikipedia
I agree with that. Current union drivers are probably fine. In a decade or so, they just might not be replaced as they retire. Blacksmiths didn't all get fired at once either.
Yours is. I don't think the generation after will be able to make a career in driving.
No point in thinking that far ahead we can't fathom the possibilities.
Technological singularity - Wikipedia
Ok. Price of sensors comes down so I put 3 where I need one. I'm good.Seems like people said the same thing about the rail roads 20 years ago. Those guys make more than UPS drivers, (worse hours though) and have a more relaxed work environment.
Corporations will be slow to implement self driving vehicles due to the liability factor and public perception.
Again, one sensor goes out on a self driving vehicle and it doesn't see the edge of the seawall, sending that whole school bus into the Pacific!
The idea is we will develop artificial intelligence capable of learning, to a point of runaway self improvement. It will create and solve without human help at all, doing things we can't even imagine at this point.Hundreds of years off. They haven't even developed reliable, non invasive and safe bio-neural-computer interface devices yet. They have projected a cat's vision onto a screen but that is a long way off from controlling computers entirely with your mind.
The point of the singularity is, it won't be IMPORTANT for a machine to interface with a human neural network, theirs will be much faster. We will be, in the words of Elon Musk, housecats.Hundreds of years off. They haven't even developed reliable, non invasive and safe bio-neural-computer interface devices yet. They have projected a cat's vision onto a screen but that is a long way off from controlling computers entirely with your mind.
The point of the singularity is, it won't be IMPORTANT for a machine to interface with a human neural network, theirs will be much faster. We will be, in the words of Elon Musk, housecats.
The idea is we will develop artificial intelligence capable of learning, to a point of runaway self improvement. It will create and solve without human help at all, doing things we can't even imagine at this point.
Well let's send all the jobs to China, have self driving cars and rigs, have doctors from India teleconferencing patients, auto checkout at stores, robot secretaries, this list could go on and on....we can all just be on welfare and bankrupt the country to the point where Russians and China could just attack from each coast and walk right in like hitler did in 1939....all this technology is going to totally ruin this world.... Wait and seeThe article is just using Hoffa's soundbite on self driving trucks to rail against California's pension issues. The Teamster pensions paid for by WCT have nothing to do with CalPERS. With regard to those, I agree that unions probably overstepped and negotiated sweetheart deals but nothing is really unsustainable when the California government has the right to tax their citizens as much as they want to.
I wish it had explored more about why Hoffa feels self driving trucks won't be a threat to our jobs. While the technology is still in it's infancy and has had some issues, it will probably be viable in the nearer-than-I-like future. If a driver is still sitting in the seat ready to take over it's not going to change a whole lot other than giving us less to do. Robotics won't be very good at connecting air hoses & light cords or rolling down trailer legs. To make those electric/automatic would cost billions of dollars. Also, who inspects the equipment as required by the FMCSA? So I think our jobs may eventually evolve but to get to the point where we are facing replacement is probably farther off than we think.