I think in most states it is the dog owner's responsibility to maintain control of their dog. Especially since a dog collision wouldn't cause a great deal of damage to the vehicle, I don't see management getting too upset.
I was going south down a two lane road earlier driving the speed limit of 45MPH earlier this year and had cars on my left going North. To my right on the sidewalk were pedestrians,and I had traffic behind me. A dog came from nowhere thru the traffic on my left and like a Kamikaze ran right infront of my truck. I had perhaps a second as he shot into the road to make my decision on how to react as he ran into my into my path. I braked to avoid hitting him but to no avail
If I had swerved left i'd have left my lane and hit traffic. Had i swerved right i'd have left my lane and hit Human pedestrians. Had I locked the truck down and slammed on brakes I'd have certainly been rear ended , suffered damage to the truck and there almost certainly would be a probability of human injury from being rear ended
I was charged with an Avoidable Accident in that I had Failed to Expect the Unexpected and asked several times" what if it had been a child" that had run into the street. I was never told what i did wrong,only that I was a Professional Driver and should have avoided the situation. Of course I am always seeking improvement so I asked How i could of prevented this situation and was told I should have slammed on the brakes as hard as i could to avoid hitting the dog.
My reply that this would have caused me to be rear ended at the least ,as well as a good chance that in swerving to avoid rear ended me the car behind me very well could have hit a pedestrian was answered with " UPS would not have been at fault " had this happened.