That's the point. In the eyes of Fat Freddy contractors were making out TOO good and set out to correct that problem in no uncertain terms.
Who’s bitching?
I wouldn't exactly call your prior comments ringing endorsements of Fat Freddy his obedient servants.
No. I wouldn't call it an endorsement. I'd call it somewhat disengaged interest. I no longer care which way it goes.
It sounds like employees/contractors are feeling the same way! I could care less what the company is doing and the future of this company.
And the odds of FedEx being found to be a joint employer based on the standards and rules stated in the article are slim.
So today your federal judge? So what does little Dano want to be tomorrow? An astronaut? How about an NFL Pro Bowl caliber receiver?
Today my federal judge what?
With my Wonderlic score? Lineman, no doubt.
Correction:...Today you're a federal judge. Yep, you might indeed make a decent lineman....An electric utility lineman....maybe.
Why do you think that?
Because the little, if any, of the criteria listed apply to FedEx.
They only have to prove 1 of the 7 conditions is true. In typical X fashion they'll probably spend more on lawyers fighting this than if they just accepted a unionized workforce though.
Proving it does not look to be difficult at all. However, any a major new rulings by the courts that will be favorable to workers is likely at least a decade away and the only people that a favorable court ruling would benefit are the people that hold long term employment with companies that stand to be impacted by those rulings.
In the states they're doing the exact opposite.
I don't think that's how it works.
