Israel

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Calling for a deal is Trump’s brand. And a deal would be better than war. But Iran still insists on getting a nuke. So the war will continue until they’ve changed their minds or their nuclear infrastructure is destroyed.
Tulsi gabbard didnt say so. I think its a lie
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
You wouldn’t take what the UN’s IAEA says over what Tulsi Gabbard says?
All tulsi said was she doesn’t believe they have a nuclear weapon yet not that they weren’t trying. No one knows for sure if they have the weapon yet it doesn’t appear so but they are close or we’re close.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
I heard the board is not to be trusted but the inspectors are. Inspectors didnt find anything. Trump shouldnt have ripped up the obama deal.
While there is no definitive evidence that the inspectors have found a nuclear weapon in Iran, there have been findings of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels and evidence of undeclared nuclear material and activities. These findings have raised concerns about the potential for a weapons
  • High Enrichment Levels:
    In 2023, the IAEA detected uranium particles enriched to 83.7% purity, which is close to weapons-grade, at an Iranian nuclear facility.
Nobody needs uranium enriched to 83% for energy @rickyb

For light water nuclear reactors,the typical uranium enrichment level for energy production is 3-5% U-235 according to the World Nuclear Association
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
I heard the board is not to be trusted but the inspectors are. Inspectors didnt find anything. Trump shouldnt have ripped up the obama deal.
You’re not to be trusted because you’re so gullible. You believe all the propaganda from the left. Stooge
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
While there is no definitive evidence that the inspectors have found a nuclear weapon in Iran, there have been findings of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels and evidence of undeclared nuclear material and activities. These findings have raised concerns about the potential for a weapons
  • High Enrichment Levels:
    In 2023, the IAEA detected uranium particles enriched to 83.7% purity, which is close to weapons-grade, at an Iranian nuclear facility.
Nobody needs uranium enriched to 83% for energy @rickyb
All i know is, Iran is going to get effed up even more than they think because of what they are doing to Israel. That regime is on borrowed time.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
While there is no definitive evidence that the inspectors have found a nuclear weapon in Iran, there have been findings of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels and evidence of undeclared nuclear material and activities. These findings have raised concerns about the potential for a weapons
  • High Enrichment Levels:
    In 2023, the IAEA detected uranium particles enriched to 83.7% purity, which is close to weapons-grade, at an Iranian nuclear facility.
Nobody needs uranium enriched to 83% for energy @rickyb
Even if thats true and i dont remember hearing that from any of the interviews, you cant just attack a country for that.

In iraq, they said they had wmds, and it was a lie
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Even if thats true and i dont remember hearing that from any of the interviews, you cant just attack a country for that.

In iraq, they said they had wmds, and it was a lie
Who says they can’t attack? The same ones you don’t trust?

And I don’t have a problem with Iran, firing back. Just as long as they know what they’re getting themselves into.
 

BrownFlush

Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
1750041378538.png
 

BrownFlush

Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
Even if thats true and i dont remember hearing that from any of the interviews, you cant just attack a country for that.

In iraq, they said they had wmds, and it was a lie
Oct.7
If Iran had nuke potential, they don't now.

And the lesson from Iraq?
Doesn't matter. You have to go with the intelligence you have.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Top